173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25799458)
1. Scanning Electron Microscopy Findings With Energy-Dispersive X-ray Investigations of Cosmetically Tinted Contact Lenses.
Hotta F; Eguchi H; Imai S; Miyamoto T; Mitamura-Aizawa S; Mitamura Y
Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Sep; 41(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 25799458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of pigment location in tinted soft contact lenses.
Jung JW; Han SH; Kim SA; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Jun; 39(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 26851138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Pigment Distribution and Depth Analysis Methods for Decorative Soft Contact Lenses.
Nomura Y; Toida H; Fukui C; Kai S; Nakaoka R; Kato R; Uematsu M; Ono K; Kanai A; Haishima Y
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S105-S112. PubMed ID: 28953599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion between cosmetic contact lenses and conventional contact lenses.
Ji YW; Cho YJ; Lee CH; Hong SH; Chung DY; Kim EK; Lee HK
Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 25536530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Pigment Location in Tinted Contact Lenses on the Ocular Surface.
Jung JW; Han SH; Park SY; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):997-1003. PubMed ID: 27232903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying Pigment Enclosure in Cosmetic Contact Lenses.
Korde V; McDow K; Rollins D; Stinchcomb R; Esposito H
Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jul; 46(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 31313698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Lubricity and Surface Roughness of 5 Cosmetic Contact Lenses.
Lau C; Tosatti S; Mundorf M; Ebare K; Osborn Lorenz K
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2(2):S256-S265. PubMed ID: 29570118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Defining the physiologically normal coating and pathological deposit: an analysis of sulfur-containing moieties and pellicle thickness on hydrogel contact lenses.
Hart DE; Plociniak MP; Grimes GW
CLAO J; 1998 Apr; 24(2):85-101. PubMed ID: 9571268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray microanalysis and immunohistochemistry on worn soft contact lenses.
Versura P; Maltarello MC; Roomans GM; Caramazza R; Laschi R
Scanning Microsc; 1988 Mar; 2(1):397-410. PubMed ID: 3285461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the surface characteristics of hydrogel contact lenses.
Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Nov; 88(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 16329748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scanning electron microscopy of deposits remaining in soft contact lens polishing marks after cleaning.
Fowler SA; Gaertner KL
CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 2379309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis of daily disposable limbal ring contact lenses.
Lorenz KO; Kakkassery J; Boree D; Pinto D
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Sep; 97(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 24689948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-Term Deposition of PM
Dong Z; Ding X; Li Y; Gan Y; Wang Y; Xu L; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Li J
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Sep; 43(9):1102-1107. PubMed ID: 29787322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of diminished microbial contamination in handling of a novel daily disposable flat pack contact lens.
Nomachi M; Sakanishi K; Ichijima H; Cavanagh HD
Eye Contact Lens; 2013 May; 39(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 23584046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydrogel contact lens-corneal interactions: a new mechanism for deposit formation and corneal injury.
Goldberg EP; Bhatia S; Enns JB
CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 9348448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface interactions on hydrogel contact lenses: scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Hart DE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1987 Dec; 58(12):962-74. PubMed ID: 3480910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of dissolution on color of extrinsic porcelain colorants.
O'Keefe KL; Powers JM; Noie F
Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 8148027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft contact lenses from patients with giant papillary conjunctivitis.
Fowler SA; Greiner JV; Allansmith MR
Am J Ophthalmol; 1979 Dec; 88(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 517610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examination of contact lens surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM).
Bhatia S; Goldberg EP; Enns JB
CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 9348451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The annular tinted contact lens syndrome: corneal topographic analysis of ring-shaped irregular astigmatism caused by annular tinted contact lenses.
Bucci FA; Evans RE; Moody KJ; Tanner JB; Capozza RC; Klyce SD
CLAO J; 1997 Jul; 23(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 9240826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
