411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25799715)
1. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamic performance of bileaflet mechanical heart valves at different implantation angles.
Kuan YH; Nguyen VT; Kabinejadian F; Su B; Kim S; Yoganathan AP; Leo HL
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 25799715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of hinge microflow fields of bileaflet mechanical heart valves implanted in different sinus shape and downstream geometry.
Kuan YH; Kabinejadian F; Nguyen VT; Su B; Yoganathan AP; Leo HL
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(16):1785-96. PubMed ID: 25343223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computational Hemodynamic Investigation of Bileaflet and Trileaflet Mechanical Heart Valves.
Kuan YH; Nguyen VT; Kabinejadian F; Leo HL
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 May; 24(3):393-403. PubMed ID: 26901919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical investigation on the effect of bileaflet mechanical heart valve's implantation tilting angle and aortic root geometry on intermittent regurgitation and platelet activation.
Abbas SS; Nasif MS; Al-Waked R; Meor Said MA
Artif Organs; 2020 Feb; 44(2):E20-E39. PubMed ID: 31378963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of heart rate on the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves' prostheses (St. Jude Medical) in the aortic position and in the opening phase: A computational study.
Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):175-90. PubMed ID: 26786673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluid-structure interaction of deformable aortic prostheses with a bileaflet mechanical valve.
de Tullio MD; Afferrante L; Demelio G; Pascazio G; Verzicco R
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1684-90. PubMed ID: 21496823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of the long-body On-X bileaflet heart valve.
Hwang NH; Reul H; Reinhard P
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 9793857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A three-dimensional, time-dependent analysis of flow through a bileaflet mechanical heart valve: comparison of experimental and numerical results.
King MJ; Corden J; David T; Fisher J
J Biomech; 1996 May; 29(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 8707787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Aortic Wall Deformation with Healthy and Calcified Annulus on Hemodynamic Performance of Implanted On-X Valve.
Sadipour M; Hanafizadeh P; Sadeghy K; Sattari A
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Apr; 11(2):141-161. PubMed ID: 31912432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position.
Hartrumpf M; Albes JM; Krempl T; Rudolph V; Wahlers T
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 23(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 12614795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in pigs.
Kleine P; Perthel M; Nygaard H; Hansen SB; Paulsen PK; Riis C; Laas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 9793855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro investigation of the retrograde flow fields of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves.
Ellis JT; Healy TM; Fontaine AA; Weston MW; Jarret CA; Saxena R; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5(6):600-6. PubMed ID: 8953437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel computational model for the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical valves in the opening phase.
Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Mar; 229(3):232-44. PubMed ID: 25833999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs.
Kleine P; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Ackermann H; Moritz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Nov; 124(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 12407375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic valve hydrodynamics: considerations on the absence of sinuses of Valsalva.
Bottio T; Buratto E; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 23409351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic particle image velocimetry study of the aortic flow field of contemporary mechanical bileaflet prostheses.
Akutsu T; Saito J; Imai R; Suzuki T; Cao XD
J Artif Organs; 2008; 11(2):75-90. PubMed ID: 18604612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of implantation orientation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve on kinematics and hemodynamics in an anatomic aorta.
Borazjani I; Sotiropoulos F
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Nov; 132(11):111005. PubMed ID: 21034146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Turbulence characteristics downstream of a new trileaflet mechanical heart valve.
Li CP; Chen SF; Lo CW; Lu PC
ASAIO J; 2011; 57(3):188-96. PubMed ID: 21499078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
