These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25800401)

  • 1. Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Sajadi KP; Goldman HB
    Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 25800401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical techniques for advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse.
    Brown DN; Strauchon C; Gonzalez H; Gruber D
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26448444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Oliver JL; Kim JH
    Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Sep; 18(9):66. PubMed ID: 28718162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic and robotic sacropexy: retrospective review of learning curve experiences and follow-up.
    Pilka R; Gágyor D; Študentová M; Neubert D; Dzvinčuk P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28925269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.
    Ichikawa M; Kaseki H; Akira S
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 Feb; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 29485251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery.
    Parkes IL; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):546-57. PubMed ID: 24462593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy Using Barbed Suture Anchoring and Peritoneal Tunneling Technique: Tips and Tricks.
    Guan X; Ma Y; Gisseman J; Kleithermes C; Liu J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):12-13. PubMed ID: 27344033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Awad N; Mustafa S; Amit A; Deutsch M; Eldor-Itskovitz J; Lowenstein L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 23274792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic Female Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Review.
    Clifton MM; Pizarro-Berdichevsky J; Goldman HB
    Urology; 2016 May; 91():33-40. PubMed ID: 26723179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Gouveia De Sa M; Claydon LS; Whitlow B; Dolcet Artahona MA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 26249235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for managing pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Yang SS; Chang SJ
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1037-1045. PubMed ID: 34779989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 26-Minute Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: Do We Really Need Robotic Technology?
    Miklos JR; Moore RD
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):712. PubMed ID: 25769671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Alas AN; Anger JT
    Curr Urol Rep; 2015 May; 16(5):33. PubMed ID: 25874589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy.
    Lee W; Tam J; Kobashi K
    Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 30466696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.