These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25800407)

  • 1. Average of delta: a new quality control tool for clinical laboratories.
    Jones GR
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Jan; 53(Pt 1):133-40. PubMed ID: 25800407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Feb; 52():112-116. PubMed ID: 29107011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance goals for the laboratory testing of antithrombin, protein C and protein S.
    Meijer P; Haverkate F; Kluft C
    Thromb Haemost; 2006 Nov; 96(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17080214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of analytical quality specifications based on biological within- and between-subject variation.
    Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Jørgensen L; Brandslund I; Stahl M; Gowans E; Libeer JC; Ricós C
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2002 Nov; 39(Pt 6):543-50. PubMed ID: 12564835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing.
    Fraser CG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 3355342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new quality control method based on a moving average of "latent reference values" selected from patients' daily test results.
    Hayashi S; Ichihara K; Kanakura Y; Iwatani Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2004 Mar; 52(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 15137317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between biological variation and delta check rules performance.
    Tan RZ; Markus C; Loh TP
    Clin Biochem; 2020 Jun; 80():42-47. PubMed ID: 32247779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Standardization of the methods of lipid determination according to WHO in the regional project of prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Friuli-Venezia Giulia].
    Grafnetter D; Feruglio GA; Vanuzzo D
    G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Mar; 26(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 8690184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. THE "AVERAGE OF NORMALS" METHOD OF QUALITY CONTROL.
    HOFFMANN RG; WAID ME
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1965 Feb; 43():134-41. PubMed ID: 14253115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and Evaluation of "The Delta Plus-Minus Even Distribution Check": A Novel Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control Method for Laboratory Tests.
    Hatanaka N; Yamamoto Y; Shiozaki Y; Kuramura E; Nagai N; Kondo A; Kamioka M
    J Appl Lab Med; 2024 Mar; 9(2):316-328. PubMed ID: 38170846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance evaluation and planning for patient-based quality control procedures.
    Ye JJ; Ingels SC; Parvin CA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Feb; 113(2):240-8. PubMed ID: 10664626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integration of data derived from biological variation into the quality management system.
    Ricós C; Alvarez V; Cava F; García-Lario JV; Hernández A; Jiménez CV; Minchinela J; Perich C; Simón M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15234631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective tool for risk assessment of sendout testing.
    Cole B; Dickerson JA; Graber ML; Fantz CR; Laposata M; Henriksen K; Astion ML; Epner P
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Jul; 434():1-5. PubMed ID: 24685573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verification of out-of-control situations detected by "average of normal" approach.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Loh TP; Badrick T
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 49(16-17):1248-1253. PubMed ID: 27452179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical Sigma metrics: A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories.
    Westgard S; Bayat H; Westgard JO
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Jun; 28(2):020502. PubMed ID: 30022879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulations of delta check rule performance to detect specimen mislabeling using historical laboratory data.
    Strathmann FG; Baird GS; Hoffman NG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2011 Oct; 412(21-22):1973-7. PubMed ID: 21782806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biological variation of laboratory analytes based on the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Lacher DA; Hughes JP; Carroll MD
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2010 Mar; (21):1-7. PubMed ID: 20540274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biologic Variation Approach to Daily Laboratory.
    Ricós C; Álvarez V; Minchinela J; Fernández-Calle P; Perich C; Boned B; González E; Simón M; Díaz-Garzón J; García-Lario JV; Cava F; Fernández-Fernández P; Corte Z; Biosca C
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 28153369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.