These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25800521)
1. Small telescopes: detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Simonsohn U Psychol Sci; 2015 May; 26(5):559-69. PubMed ID: 25800521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance? Piper SK; Grittner U; Rex A; Riedel N; Fischer F; Nadon R; Siegerink B; Dirnagl U PLoS Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(4):e3000188. PubMed ID: 30964856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of sample size and testing power (Part 1). Hu LP; Bao XL; Zhou SG; Guan X; Xin HL Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2011 Oct; 9(10):1070-4. PubMed ID: 22015187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication. van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1515-1539. PubMed ID: 28936638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blinded sample size re-estimation in three-arm trials with 'gold standard' design. Mütze T; Friede T Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3636-3653. PubMed ID: 28608469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of sample size and testing power (Part 3). Hu LP; Bao XL; Guan X; Zhou SG Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2011 Dec; 9(12):1307-11. PubMed ID: 22152768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How often is prep close to the true replication probability? Trafimow D; MacDonald JA; Rice S; Clason DL Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 20822254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction Interval: What to Expect When You're Expecting … A Replication. Spence JR; Stanley DJ PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162874. PubMed ID: 27644090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planning sample sizes when effect sizes are uncertain: The power-calibrated effect size approach. McShane BB; Böckenholt U Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 26651984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analysis and importance of statistical power and sample size in empirical scientific research]. Klimek KM Wiad Lek; 2008; 61(7-9):211-5. PubMed ID: 19172834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins. Dilba G; Bretz F; Hothorn LA; Guiard V Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1131-47. PubMed ID: 16217842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Aspects of sample size determination and power calculation illustrated on examples from rehabilitation research]. Kutschmann M; Bender R; Grouven U; Berg G Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2006 Dec; 45(6):377-84. PubMed ID: 17123220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Addressing the "Replication Crisis": Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power. Anderson SF; Maxwell SE Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):305-324. PubMed ID: 28266872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean? Maxwell SE; Lau MY; Howard GS Am Psychol; 2015 Sep; 70(6):487-98. PubMed ID: 26348332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three ways to make replication mainstream. Gernsbacher MA Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Jan; 41():e129. PubMed ID: 30757985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study. Yeo A; Qu Y Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18381588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power and sample size. Case LD; Ambrosius WT Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():377-408. PubMed ID: 18450060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments. Schauer JM; Hedges LV Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]