These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25800943)

  • 1. Summarising and validating test accuracy results across multiple studies for use in clinical practice.
    Riley RD; Ahmed I; Debray TP; Willis BH; Noordzij JP; Higgins JP; Deeks JJ
    Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(13):2081-103. PubMed ID: 25800943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random-effects meta-analysis of the clinical utility of tests and prediction models.
    Wynants L; Riley RD; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):2034-2052. PubMed ID: 29575170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
    Leeflang MM; Deeks JJ; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 65(10):1088-97. PubMed ID: 22742916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Bayes theorem to estimate positive and negative predictive values for continuously and ordinally scaled diagnostic tests.
    Fischer F
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2021 Jun; 30(2):e1868. PubMed ID: 33650777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Allotey J; Snell KI; Smuk M; Hooper R; Chan CL; Ahmed A; Chappell LC; von Dadelszen P; Dodds J; Green M; Kenny L; Khalil A; Khan KS; Mol BW; Myers J; Poston L; Thilaganathan B; Staff AC; Smith GC; Ganzevoort W; Laivuori H; Odibo AO; Ramírez JA; Kingdom J; Daskalakis G; Farrar D; Baschat AA; Seed PT; Prefumo F; da Silva Costa F; Groen H; Audibert F; Masse J; Skråstad RB; Salvesen KÅ; Haavaldsen C; Nagata C; Rumbold AR; Heinonen S; Askie LM; Smits LJ; Vinter CA; Magnus PM; Eero K; Villa PM; Jenum AK; Andersen LB; Norman JE; Ohkuchi A; Eskild A; Bhattacharya S; McAuliffe FM; Galindo A; Herraiz I; Carbillon L; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Yeo S; Teede HJ; Browne JL; Moons KG; Riley RD; Thangaratinam S
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Dec; 24(72):1-252. PubMed ID: 33336645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint confidence region estimation on predictive values.
    Schaible BJ; Yin J
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Nov; 20(6):1147-1167. PubMed ID: 34021708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual participant data meta-analysis for external validation, recalibration, and updating of a flexible parametric prognostic model.
    Ensor J; Snell KIE; Debray TPA; Lambert PC; Look MP; Mamas MA; Moons KGM; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2021 Jun; 40(13):3066-3084. PubMed ID: 33768582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidance for deriving and presenting percentage study weights in meta-analysis of test accuracy studies.
    Burke DL; Ensor J; Snell KIE; van der Windt D; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):163-178. PubMed ID: 29115060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian prediction model between a biomarker and the clinical endpoint for dichotomous variables.
    Jiang Z; Song Y; Shou Q; Xia J; Wang W
    Trials; 2014 Dec; 15():500. PubMed ID: 25528466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence diagnostics and outlier detection for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Matsushima Y; Noma H; Yamada T; Furukawa TA
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 31724796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes.
    Debray TP; Damen JA; Riley RD; Snell K; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Collins GS; Moons KG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2768-2786. PubMed ID: 30032705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people.
    Cruciani M; Mengoli C; Loeffler J; Donnelly P; Barnes R; Jones BL; Klingspor L; Morton O; Maertens J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Oct; (10):CD009551. PubMed ID: 26424726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people.
    Cruciani M; Mengoli C; Loeffler J; Donnelly P; Barnes R; Jones BL; Klingspor L; Morton O; Maertens J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD009551. PubMed ID: 26343815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does exposure to simulated patient cases improve accuracy of clinicians' predictive value estimates of diagnostic test results? A within-subjects experiment at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
    Armstrong B; Spaniol J; Persaud N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e019241. PubMed ID: 29440215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 1. Toxicity test methods that have predictive capacity no greater than chance.
    Bruner LH; Carr GJ; Harbell JW; Curren RD
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2002 Jun; 21(6):305-12. PubMed ID: 12195934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician and Nonphysician Estimates of Positive Predictive Value in Diagnostic v. Mass Screening Mammography: An Examination of Bayesian Reasoning.
    Austin LC
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Feb; 39(2):108-118. PubMed ID: 30678607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of non-contact infrared thermometers and thermal scanners: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Aggarwal N; Garg M; Dwarakanathan V; Gautam N; Kumar SS; Jadon RS; Gupta M; Ray A
    J Travel Med; 2020 Dec; 27(8):. PubMed ID: 33043363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cold pulp testing is the simplest and most accurate of all dental pulp sensibility tests.
    Balevi B
    Evid Based Dent; 2019 Mar; 20(1):22-23. PubMed ID: 30903124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multivariate meta-analysis of individual participant data helped externally validate the performance and implementation of a prediction model.
    Snell KI; Hua H; Debray TP; Ensor J; Look MP; Moons KG; Riley RD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():40-50. PubMed ID: 26142114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.