These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25801097)

  • 1. Neural correlates of early-closure garden-path processing: Effects of prosody and plausibility.
    den Ouden DB; Dickey MW; Anderson C; Christianson K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):926-49. PubMed ID: 25801097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intonation guides sentence processing in the left inferior frontal gyrus.
    van der Burght CL; Goucha T; Friederici AD; Kreitewolf J; Hartwigsen G
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():122-134. PubMed ID: 30974320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiology of prosodic and lexical-semantic processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia.
    Sheppard SM; Love T; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Shapiro LP
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Dec; 107():9-24. PubMed ID: 29061490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of morphosyntactic and verb-argument structure processing: an EfMRI study.
    Raettig T; Frisch S; Friederici AD; Kotz SA
    Cortex; 2010 May; 46(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 19664766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of Fundamental Frequency and Temporal Envelope in Processing Sentences with Temporary Syntactic Ambiguities.
    Sharpe V; Fogerty D; den Ouden DB
    Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):399-426. PubMed ID: 28915784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is it that lingers? Garden-path (mis)interpretations in younger and older adults.
    Malyutina S; den Ouden DB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):880-906. PubMed ID: 25920901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional segregation of the inferior frontal gyrus for syntactic processes: a functional magnetic-resonance imaging study.
    Uchiyama Y; Toyoda H; Honda M; Yoshida H; Kochiyama T; Ebe K; Sadato N
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Jul; 61(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 18457890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural basis of syntactic processing of simple sentences in Japanese.
    Ogawa K; Ohba M; Inui T
    Neuroreport; 2007 Sep; 18(14):1437-41. PubMed ID: 17712270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict control during sentence comprehension: fMRI evidence.
    Ye Z; Zhou X
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 48(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 19540923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.
    Krause CD; Fengler A; Pino D; Sehm B; Friederici AD; Obrig H
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Feb; 180():108465. PubMed ID: 36586718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does the brain mediate interpretation of incongruent auditory emotions? The neural response to prosody in the presence of conflicting lexico-semantic cues.
    Mitchell RL
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(12):3611-8. PubMed ID: 17229109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Syntactic and semantic modulation of neural activity during auditory sentence comprehension.
    Humphries C; Binder JR; Medler DA; Liebenthal E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):665-79. PubMed ID: 16768368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody.
    Meyer M; Steinhauer K; Alter K; Friederici AD; von Cramon DY
    Brain Lang; 2004 May; 89(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 15068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task-modulated activation and functional connectivity of the temporal and frontal areas during speech comprehension.
    Yue Q; Zhang L; Xu G; Shu H; Li P
    Neuroscience; 2013 May; 237():87-95. PubMed ID: 23357111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic assignment of neural resources in auditory comprehension of complex sentences.
    Obleser J; Meyer L; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(4):2310-20. PubMed ID: 21421059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments.
    Ben-Shachar M; Palti D; Grodzinsky Y
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1320-36. PubMed ID: 15050558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sign and speech: amodal commonality in left hemisphere dominance for comprehension of sentences.
    Sakai KL; Tatsuno Y; Suzuki K; Kimura H; Ichida Y
    Brain; 2005 Jun; 128(Pt 6):1407-17. PubMed ID: 15728651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using complement coercion to understand the neural basis of semantic composition: evidence from an fMRI study.
    Husband EM; Kelly LA; Zhu DC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3254-66. PubMed ID: 21557650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interface between language and attention: prosodic focus marking recruits a general attention network in spoken language comprehension.
    Kristensen LB; Wang L; Petersson KM; Hagoort P
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 Aug; 23(8):1836-48. PubMed ID: 22763170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.