These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25801180)

  • 1. Comparison of operational characteristics for binary tests with clustered data.
    Kwak M; Um SW; Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(15):2325-33. PubMed ID: 25801180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs.
    Moskowitz CS; Pepe MS
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 16895044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.
    Cai T; Cheng S
    Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 18056687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal two-phase sampling design for comparing accuracies of two binary classification rules.
    Xu H; Hui SL; Grannis S
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):500-13. PubMed ID: 24038175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of predictive values of two diagnostic tests from the same sample of subjects using weighted least squares.
    Wang W; Davis CS; Soong SJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2215-29. PubMed ID: 16220470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The weighted generalized estimating equations approach for the evaluation of medical diagnostic test at subunit level.
    Lin CY; Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):758-71. PubMed ID: 17094341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifiability of models for multiple diagnostic testing in the absence of a gold standard.
    Jones G; Johnson WO; Hanson TE; Christensen R
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):855-63. PubMed ID: 19764953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pairwise residuals and diagnostic tests for misspecified dependence structures in models for binary longitudinal data.
    Breinegaard N; Rabe-Hesketh S; Skrondal A
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):343-356. PubMed ID: 29082538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs.
    Leisenring W; Alonzo T; Pepe MS
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10877288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A GEE approach to estimating accuracy and its confidence intervals for correlated data.
    Lim Y
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Jan; 19(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 31448536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new likelihood approach to inference about predictive values of diagnostic tests in paired designs.
    Tsou TS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):541-548. PubMed ID: 27114327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5821-30. PubMed ID: 21158294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
    Xu H; Craig BA
    Biometrics; 2009 Dec; 65(4):1145-55. PubMed ID: 19210729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation.
    Chen F; Xue Y; Tan MT; Chen P
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(9):1560-76. PubMed ID: 25640747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation efficiency and tests of covariate effects with clustered binary data.
    Neuhaus JM
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):989-96. PubMed ID: 8117909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On simultaneous assessment of sensitivity and specificity when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Tang ML
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3593-605. PubMed ID: 15534897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of diagnostic procedures for tumor detection rates in paired data.
    Lim Y; Choi JS; Kim K; Park M; Kim S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1477-1488. PubMed ID: 29557258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Joint estimation of diagnostic accuracy measures for paired organs--application in ophthalmology.
    de Leon AR; Soo A; Bonzo DC; Rudnisky CJ
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):837-50. PubMed ID: 19697307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the predictiveness of a continuous marker.
    Huang Y; Sullivan Pepe M; Feng Z
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1181-8. PubMed ID: 17489968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.