These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25801278)

  • 21. A New Solution for Confined-Unconfined Flow Toward a Fully Penetrating Well in a Confined Aquifer.
    Xiao L; Ye M; Xu Y
    Ground Water; 2018 Nov; 56(6):959-968. PubMed ID: 29417577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simulation of water-table aquifers using specified saturated thickness.
    Sheets RA; Hill MC; Haitjema HM; Provost AM; Masterson JP
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 24502651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Groundwater Flow Field Distortion by Monitoring Wells and Passive Flux Meters.
    Verreydt G; Bronders J; Van Keer I; Diels L; Vanderauwera P
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(6):933-42. PubMed ID: 25565034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Hybridized GA with LP-LP Model for the Management of Confined Groundwater.
    Khadem M; Afshar MH
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 25059262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new package in MODFLOW to simulate unconfined groundwater flow in sloping aquifers.
    Wang Q; Zhan H; Tang Z
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(6):924-35. PubMed ID: 24299562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determination of specific yield for the Biscayne Aquifer with a canal-drawdown test.
    Bolster CH; Genereux DP; Saiers JE
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 11554256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Water quality as an indicator of hydrogeological conditions: a case study of the Belgrade Groundwater Source (Sava/Danube confluence area).
    Papić P; Pušić M; Todorović M
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(12):2265-71. PubMed ID: 22643425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Methane gas transport in unconfined aquifers: A numerical sensitivity study of a controlled release experiment at CFB Borden.
    Klazinga DR; Steelman CM; Cahill AG; Walton KM; Endres AL; Parker BL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Aug; 225():103506. PubMed ID: 31181538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Management of aquifer recharge in Lebanon by removing seawater intrusion from coastal aquifers.
    Masciopinto C
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 130():306-12. PubMed ID: 24103702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Drawdown distribution in the vicinity of nonvertical wells.
    Williams DE
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 23216076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fractional derivative method for anomalous aquitard flow in a leaky aquifer system with depth-decaying aquitard hydraulic conductivity.
    Li Y; Zhou Z; Zhang N
    Water Res; 2024 Feb; 249():120957. PubMed ID: 38070345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detecting a Defective Casing Seal at the Top of a Bedrock Aquifer.
    Richard SK; Chesnaux R; Rouleau A
    Ground Water; 2016 Mar; 54(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 26212855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Joint Estimation of Hydraulic and Poroelastic Parameters from a Pumping Test.
    Berg SJ; Illman WA; Mok CM
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(5):759-70. PubMed ID: 25243589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maximizing net extraction using an injection-extraction well pair in a coastal aquifer.
    Lu C; Werner AD; Simmons CT; Robinson NI; Luo J
    Ground Water; 2013 Mar; 51(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 22880816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interpreting Variations in Groundwater Flows from Repeated Distributed Thermal Perturbation Tests.
    Hausner MB; Kryder L; Klenke J; Reinke R; Tyler SW
    Ground Water; 2016 Jul; 54(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 26714003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of modeled recharge distribution on simulated groundwater availability and capture.
    Tillman FD; Pool DR; Leake SA
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 24841767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling a Large-Scale Historic Aquifer Test: Insight into the Hydrogeology of a Regional Fault Zone.
    Hadley DR; Abrams DB; Roadcap GS
    Ground Water; 2020 May; 58(3):453-463. PubMed ID: 31290141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tensor hydraulic conductivity estimation for heterogeneous aquifers under unknown boundary conditions.
    Jiao J; Zhang Y
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 24898280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interpretation of Pumping Tests in Heterogeneous Aquifers with Constant Head Boundary.
    Pechstein A; Copty NK
    Ground Water; 2021 Jul; 59(4):517-523. PubMed ID: 33389747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A distance-drawdown aquifer test method for aquifers with areal anisotropy.
    Mutch RD
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):935-8. PubMed ID: 16324014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.