105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25801721)
1. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse.
Li S; Ji M; Zhao Z
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():74-8. PubMed ID: 25801721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing uterine preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh versus laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
Doğan O; Yassa M; Eren E; Birol İlter P; Tuğ N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():120-125. PubMed ID: 38608354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results.
Peng J; Li S; Wang L; Yang L; Nai M; Xu Q; Jin Y; Liu P; Li L
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18519. PubMed ID: 37898708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical efficacy of modified sacral fixation under Leonardo da Vinci robot laparoscopy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei W; Fang ZY; Chen YL; Ma YQ; Wei X; Yang HY; Zhang CL; Zhai YZ; Cai Q; Lu YX
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Jul; 27(13):6215-6222. PubMed ID: 37458627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Italian multicenter mid-term analysis of laparoscopic lateral suspension in women with pelvic organ prolapse: clinical, sexual and Quality of Life assessment after surgical intervention.
Schiavi MC; Passarello A; Grossi G; Calcagno M; Contadini A; Ferro G; DI Pasquale F; Zullo MA; Morciano A; Valensise H; Palazzetti PL; Cervigni M; Caiazzo N
Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun; 76(3):272-278. PubMed ID: 38088742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateral suspension with V-NOTES for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Salman-Ketenci Gencer technique.
Ketenci Gencer F; Salman S; Kumbasar S; Bacak HB; Khatib O; Kaya C; Yildiz E; Coskun ES
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jul; 34(7):1583-1591. PubMed ID: 36625926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential relevance of pre-operative quality of life questionnaires to identify candidates for surgical treatment of genital prolapse: a pilot study.
Chauvin C; Chéreau E; Ballester M; Daraï E
BMC Urol; 2012 Mar; 12():9. PubMed ID: 22452922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Iatrogenic endometriosis following apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a case report.
Cubuk A; Ozkaptan O; Neymeyer J
J Med Case Rep; 2020 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 31901247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Sexual Life in Women After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy using PISQ-IR.
Rusavy Z; Kovarova V; Tvarozek S; Smazinka M; Havir M; Kalis V
Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Apr; 35(4):873-880. PubMed ID: 38485810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal Bilateral Sacrospinous Fixation after Second Recurrence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Efficacy and Impact on Quality of Life and Sexuality.
Vitale SG; Laganà AS; Noventa M; Giampaolino P; Zizolfi B; Butticè S; La Rosa VL; Gullo G; Rossetti D
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():5727165. PubMed ID: 29675427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic vaginal stump–round (Kakinuma method) and stump–uterosacral (Shull method) ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective comparative study.
Kakinuma T; Kakinuma K; Ueyama K; Shinohara T; Okamoto R; Imai K; Takeshima N; Yanagida K; Ohwada M
BMC Surg; 2024 May; 24(1):137. PubMed ID: 38711094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mesh-less laparoscopic extraperitoneal linear suspension treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.
Wang W; Liang H; Yu H; Rong C; Dong Y; Xue M; Liu X; Liang J; Ling B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 May; 296():275-279. PubMed ID: 38493551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages of Laparoscopic Treatment in Pelvic Static Disorders by Lateral Hystero/Colpopexy - A Single Center Experience.
Niţu I; Sârbu V; Savin S; Șerban S; Popescu S; Niţu TȘ; Neacşu MS
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2024 Apr; 119(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 38743834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Should sacrouterine plication be added to lateral suspension surgery? A prospective study.
Şahin F; Özdemir S; Doğan O
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Jun; 50(6):1042-1050. PubMed ID: 38627198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality-of-life improvements in patients after various surgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse.
Guan Y; Han J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 309(3):813-820. PubMed ID: 37464172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transvaginal extraperitoneal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse after total/subtotal hysterectomy: Chinese surgeons' initial experience.
Lu Z; Chen Y; Xiao C; Hua K; Hu C
BMC Surg; 2024 Jan; 24(1):25. PubMed ID: 38229131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine uterine preservation during sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse-Cons.
Dequirez PL; Rosenblum N; Brucker BM
Prog Urol; 2023 Dec; 33(17):1041-1043. PubMed ID: 37661490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.
Xu S; Nie J; Zeng W; Lai Y; Chen X; Yu Y
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2023 Dec; 18(4):690-697. PubMed ID: 38239581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Xu H; Ding H; Shi C; Ge Q
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 52(10):102634. PubMed ID: 37500012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]