405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25801721)
21. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse.
Zhu L; Sun Z; Yu M; Li B; Li X; Lang J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 May; 121(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 23415023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Prospective multi-center study in "Xiehe" pelvic floor reconstruction surgery for severe pelvic organ prolapse].
Sun ZJ; Zhu L; Lang JH; Hua KQ; Yang X; Han JS; Liang ZQ; Hu LN; Wang JL; Ma L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 46(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 22169511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse: a retrospective case series report.
Rosenblatt PL; Chelmow D; Ferzandi TR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 18439495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.
Barber MD; Walters MD; Cundiff GW;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 194(5):1492-8. PubMed ID: 16647933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Laparoscopic repair of pelvic organ prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh: a continuous series of 218 patients].
Dubuisson JB; Eperon I; Jacob S; Dubuisson J; Wenger JM; Dallenbach P; Kaelin-Gambirasio I
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Mar; 39(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 21377391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing uterine preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh versus laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
Doğan O; Yassa M; Eren E; Birol İlter P; Tuğ N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():120-125. PubMed ID: 38608354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Medium-term outcomes after combined trachelectomy and uterosacral ligament suspension among young women with severe uterine prolapse.
Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Feb; 132(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 26613824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and sacrocervicopexy: initial experience with a novel surgical approach to uterovaginal prolapse.
Rosenblatt PL; Apostolis CA; Hacker MR; DiSciullo A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):749-55. PubMed ID: 23084680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results.
Peng J; Li S; Wang L; Yang L; Nai M; Xu Q; Jin Y; Liu P; Li L
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18519. PubMed ID: 37898708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surgical outcomes and quality of life post-synthetic mesh-augmented repair for pelvic organ prolapse in the Chinese population.
Sun X; Zhang X; Wang J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Feb; 40(2):509-14. PubMed ID: 24118430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical efficacy of modified sacral fixation under Leonardo da Vinci robot laparoscopy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei W; Fang ZY; Chen YL; Ma YQ; Wei X; Yang HY; Zhang CL; Zhai YZ; Cai Q; Lu YX
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Jul; 27(13):6215-6222. PubMed ID: 37458627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a randomised comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpo-cervicopexy to the new laparoscopic pectopexy. Short-term postoperative results.
Noé KG; Spüntrup C; Anapolski M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 22945837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two years follow up of 270 patients treated by transvaginal mesh for anterior and/or apical prolapse.
Hugele F; Panel L; Farache C; Kashef A; Cornille A; Courtieu C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():16-22. PubMed ID: 27886523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for management of pelvic organ prolapse enhances quality of life at one year: a prospective observational study.
Perez T; Crochet P; Descargues G; Tribondeau P; Soffray F; Gadonneix P; Loundou A; Baumstarck-Barrau K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 22024261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Early safety and efficacy outcomes of a novel technique of sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse.
Rajshekhar S; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris E
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 135(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 27498595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go?
Wong V; Guzman Rojas R; Shek KL; Chou D; Moore KH; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 26877210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Prospective study of the Perigee system in the treatment of anterior pelvic organ prolapse].
Lai QY; Yang X; Zhu Y; Tan C; Ling M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 51(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 26917478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sexual function in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
Glavind K; Larsen T; Lindquist AS
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 25287151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
