138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25801723)
1. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.
Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies-a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
Aviram A; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E; Yoon EW; Melamed N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 231(1):124.e1-124.e11. PubMed ID: 37979823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mid-trimester cervical length and prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients: A retrospective study.
Liu G; Zhou C; Wang S; Zhang H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 52(9):102647. PubMed ID: 37611746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a Modified Score System as Prediction Model for Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.
Xing YP; Qi XY; Wang XZ; Yang FZ
Clin Transl Sci; 2019 Jan; 12(1):53-57. PubMed ID: 30548202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Southeast China: a retrospective cohort study.
Zhang HL; Zheng LH; Cheng LC; Liu ZD; Yu L; Han Q; Miao GY; Yan JY
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Sep; 20(1):538. PubMed ID: 32933509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation of prediction models for vaginal delivery after the trial of labour among women with previous one caesarean section - A cohort study.
Pegu B; Subburaj SP; Chaturvedula L; Sarkar S; Nair NS; Keepanasseril A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Dec; 291():10-15. PubMed ID: 37801782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean in China.
Rao J; Fan D; Li P; Li Y; Hu P; Wu Z; He J; Liu X; Peng B; Guo X; Liu Z
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Oct; 163(1):202-210. PubMed ID: 37096667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor?
Grobman WA; Lai Y; Landon MB; Spong CY; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 200(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18822401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a Patient-Centered Decision Support Tool on Rates of Trial of Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery: The PROCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.
Kuppermann M; Kaimal AJ; Blat C; Gonzalez J; Thiet MP; Bermingham Y; Altshuler AL; Bryant AS; Bacchetti P; Grobman WA
JAMA; 2020 Jun; 323(21):2151-2159. PubMed ID: 32484533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study.
Vankan E; van Kuijk SMJ; Nijhuis JG; Aardenburg R; Delemarre FMC; Dirksen CD; van Dooren IM; Kuppens SMI; Kwee A; Langenveld J; Schoorel EN; Smits LJ; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
J Perinat Med; 2021 Mar; 49(3):357-363. PubMed ID: 33155996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applying Automated Machine Learning to Predict Mode of Delivery Using Ongoing Intrapartum Data in Laboring Patients.
Wong MS; Wells M; Zamanzadeh D; Akre S; Pevnick JM; Bui AAT; Gregory KD
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e412-e419. PubMed ID: 35752169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction.
Alavifard S; Meier K; Shulman Y; Tomlinson G; D'Souza R
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):130. PubMed ID: 30991983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preferred mode of delivery and its associated factors in pregnant women with a previous cesarean scar at a tertiary care hospital in Ethiopia: institutional-based cross-sectional study.
Wagaw AC; Sendekie AK; Nigatu SG; Mihretie GS
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Aug; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37582715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a Predictive Model of Vaginal Birth after Caesarean Section in Pakistani Women.
Bari A; Jaleel R; Arif S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2024 Apr; 34(4):440-444. PubMed ID: 38576287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of organizational factors on the offer and success rate of a trial of labor after cesarean section in Belgium: an ecological study.
Vandenberghe G; Vercoutere A; Cuvellier N; Van Oost E; Leroy C; Goemaes R; Laubach M; Boulvain M; Daelemans C;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Sep; 23(1):684. PubMed ID: 37736714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How birth outcomes among a cohort of Guatemalan women with a history of prior cesarean vary by mode or birth across different interpregnancy intervals.
Harrison MS; Garces A; Figueroa L; Westcott J; Hambidge M; Krebs NF
Reprod Health; 2021 May; 18(1):99. PubMed ID: 34020660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Middle eastern college of obstetricians and gynecologists (MCOG) practice guidelines: Role of prediction models in management of trial of labor after cesarean section. Practice guideline no. 05-O-22
Elammary MN; Zohiry M; Sayed A; Atef F; Ali N; Hussein I; Mahran MA; Said AE; Elassall GM; Radwan AA; Shazly SA
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 52(6):102598. PubMed ID: 37087045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with labor after cesarean in a prospective cohort.
Attanasio LB; Paterno MT; Kjerulff KH
Birth; 2022 Dec; 49(4):833-842. PubMed ID: 35608986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a new calculator for predicting success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Nittur NR; Reyes C; Marshall M; Ponzini M; Wilson M; Cansino C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38908655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of unplanned cesarean section using measurable maternal and fetal characteristics, Ethiopia, a retrospective cohort study.
Fente BM; Asaye MM; Gudayu TW; Mihret MS; Tesema GA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Feb; 24(1):161. PubMed ID: 38395796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
