These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25801895)
1. EUROPattern Suite technology for computer-aided immunofluorescence microscopy in autoantibody diagnostics. Krause C; Ens K; Fechner K; Voigt J; Fraune J; Rohwäder E; Hahn M; Danckwardt M; Feirer C; Barth E; Martinetz T; Stöcker W Lupus; 2015 Apr; 24(4-5):516-29. PubMed ID: 25801895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated Processing and Evaluation of Anti-Nuclear Antibody Indirect Immunofluorescence Testing. Ricchiuti V; Adams J; Hardy DJ; Katayev A; Fleming JK Front Immunol; 2018; 9():927. PubMed ID: 29780386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated Evaluation of Crithidia luciliae Based Indirect Immunofluorescence Tests: A Novel Application of the EUROPattern-Suite Technology. Gerlach S; Affeldt K; Pototzki L; Krause C; Voigt J; Fraune J; Fechner K J Immunol Res; 2015; 2015():742402. PubMed ID: 26581239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated Versus Conventional Microscopic Interpretation of Antinuclear Antibody Indirect Immunofluorescence Test. Park Y; Kim SY; Kwon GC; Koo SH; Kang ES; Kim J Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2019 Jan; 49(1):127-133. PubMed ID: 30814088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated antinuclear immunofluorescence antibody screening: a comparative study of six computer-aided diagnostic systems. Bizzaro N; Antico A; Platzgummer S; Tonutti E; Bassetti D; Pesente F; Tozzoli R; Tampoia M; Villalta D; Autoimmun Rev; 2014 Mar; 13(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 24220268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of an Automated Fluorescence Antinuclear Antibody Image Analyzer. Yoo IY; Oh JW; Cha HS; Koh EM; Kang ES Ann Lab Med; 2017 May; 37(3):240-247. PubMed ID: 28224770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance analysis of automated evaluation of Crithidia luciliae-based indirect immunofluorescence tests in a routine setting - strengths and weaknesses. Hormann W; Hahn M; Gerlach S; Hochstrate N; Affeldt K; Giesen J; Fechner K; Damoiseaux JGMC Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 56(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 28672732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated indirect immunofluorescence evaluation of antinuclear autoantibodies on HEp-2 cells. Voigt J; Krause C; Rohwäder E; Saschenbrecker S; Hahn M; Danckwardt M; Feirer C; Ens K; Fechner K; Barth E; Martinetz T; Stöcker W Clin Dev Immunol; 2012; 2012():651058. PubMed ID: 23251220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the automated indirect immunofluorescence test for anti-dsDNA antibodies. Wu S; Wang F; Huang J; Yin B; Huang M; Wei W; Zhang M; Ouyang R Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Nov; 498():143-147. PubMed ID: 31442448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody analysis is a standardized alternative for visual microscope interpretation. Bonroy C; Verfaillie C; Smith V; Persijn L; De Witte E; De Keyser F; Devreese K Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Sep; 51(9):1771-9. PubMed ID: 23612554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study on the reliability of an automated system for the evaluation of cell-based indirect immunofluorescence. Melegari A; Bonaguri C; Russo A; Luisita B; Trenti T; Lippi G Autoimmun Rev; 2012 Aug; 11(10):713-6. PubMed ID: 22269861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of a Computer-Aided Microscope System and Its Anti-Nuclear Antibody Test Kit for Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay]. Hayashi N; Saegusa J; Uto K; Oyabu C; Saito T; Sato I; Kawano S; Kumagai S Rinsho Byori; 2016 Feb; 64(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 27311277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies by computer-aided automated immunofluorescence analysis. Lakos G; Gonzalez M; Flaherty D; Bentow C; Ibarra C; Stimson D; Nacario L; Hiemann R; Dervieux T J Immunol Methods; 2016 Jun; 433():17-22. PubMed ID: 26921629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A fully automated IIF system for the detection of antinuclear antibodies and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Shovman O; Agmon-Levin N; Gilburd B; Martins T; Petzold A; Matthias T; Shoenfeld Y Immunol Res; 2015 Feb; 61(1-2):135-40. PubMed ID: 25403695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated evaluation of autoantibodies on human epithelial-2 cells as an approach to standardize cell-based immunofluorescence tests. Egerer K; Roggenbuck D; Hiemann R; Weyer MG; Büttner T; Radau B; Krause R; Lehmann B; Feist E; Burmester GR Arthritis Res Ther; 2010; 12(2):R40. PubMed ID: 20214808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance analysis of automated evaluation of antinuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescent tests in a routine setting. van Beers JJBC; Hahn M; Fraune J; Mallet K; Krause C; Hormann W; Fechner K; Damoiseaux JGMC Auto Immun Highlights; 2018 Sep; 9(1):8. PubMed ID: 30238164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel method for ANA quantitation using IIF imaging system. Peng X; Tang J; Wu Y; Yang B; Hu J J Immunol Methods; 2014 Feb; 404():52-8. PubMed ID: 24370749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic profile on the IFA 40: HEp-20-10 - an immunofluorescence test for reliable antinuclear antibody screening. Rohwäder E; Locke M; Fraune J; Fechner K Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2015 Apr; 15(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 25530004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The burden of the variability introduced by the HEp-2 assay kit and the CAD system in ANA indirect immunofluorescence test. Infantino M; Meacci F; Grossi V; Manfredi M; Benucci M; Merone M; Soda P Immunol Res; 2017 Feb; 65(1):345-354. PubMed ID: 27456204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]