These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25802068)

  • 21. Age-related hearing loss influences functional connectivity of auditory cortex for the McGurk illusion.
    Rosemann S; Smith D; Dewenter M; Thiel CM
    Cortex; 2020 Aug; 129():266-280. PubMed ID: 32535378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A; Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Weak observer-level correlation and strong stimulus-level correlation between the McGurk effect and audiovisual speech-in-noise: A causal inference explanation.
    Magnotti JF; Dzeda KB; Wegner-Clemens K; Rennig J; Beauchamp MS
    Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():371-383. PubMed ID: 33221701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reducing Playback Rate of Audiovisual Speech Leads to a Surprising Decrease in the McGurk Effect.
    Magnotti JF; Basu Mallick D; Beauchamp MS
    Multisens Res; 2018 Jan; 31(1-2):19-38. PubMed ID: 31264598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. fMRI-Guided transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals that the superior temporal sulcus is a cortical locus of the McGurk effect.
    Beauchamp MS; Nath AR; Pasalar S
    J Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 30(7):2414-7. PubMed ID: 20164324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in audiovisual integration, as measured by McGurk phenomenon, among adult and adolescent patients with schizophrenia and age-matched healthy control groups.
    Pearl D; Yodashkin-Porat D; Katz N; Valevski A; Aizenberg D; Sigler M; Weizman A; Kikinzon L
    Compr Psychiatry; 2009; 50(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 19216897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The temporal binding window for audiovisual speech: Children are like little adults.
    Hillock-Dunn A; Grantham DW; Wallace MT
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():74-82. PubMed ID: 26920938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sight and sound out of synch: fragmentation and renormalisation of audiovisual integration and subjective timing.
    Freeman ED; Ipser A; Palmbaha A; Paunoiu D; Brown P; Lambert C; Leff A; Driver J
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2875-87. PubMed ID: 23664001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Developmental Trajectory of McGurk Effect Susceptibility in Children and Adults With Amblyopia.
    Narinesingh C; Goltz HC; Raashid RA; Wong AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 56(3):2107-13. PubMed ID: 25744982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.
    Venezia JH; Thurman SM; Matchin W; George SE; Hickok G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):583-601. PubMed ID: 26669309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Individual differences and the effect of face configuration information in the McGurk effect.
    Ujiie Y; Asai T; Wakabayashi A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Apr; 236(4):973-984. PubMed ID: 29383400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect: links with lipreading and detecting audiovisual incongruity.
    Strand J; Cooperman A; Rowe J; Simenstad A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Dec; 57(6):2322-31. PubMed ID: 25296272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
    Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A causal inference explanation for enhancement of multisensory integration by co-articulation.
    Magnotti JF; Smith KB; Salinas M; Mays J; Zhu LL; Beauchamp MS
    Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):18032. PubMed ID: 30575791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bayesian binding and fusion models explain illusion and enhancement effects in audiovisual speech perception.
    Lindborg A; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246986. PubMed ID: 33606815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual influences on perception of speech and nonspeech vocal-tract events.
    Brancazio L; Best CT; Fowler CA
    Lang Speech; 2006; 49(Pt 1):21-53. PubMed ID: 16922061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. McGurk stimuli for the investigation of multisensory integration in cochlear implant users: The Oldenburg Audio Visual Speech Stimuli (OLAVS).
    Stropahl M; Schellhardt S; Debener S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):863-872. PubMed ID: 27562763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect.
    Munhall KG; Gribble P; Sacco L; Ward M
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 8935896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.