172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25802577)
1. Nubac disc arthroplasty: preclinical studies and preliminary safety and efficacy evaluations.
Bao QB; Songer M; Pimenta L; Werner D; Reyes-Sanchez A; Balsano M; Agrillo U; Coric D; Davenport K; Yuan H
SAS J; 2007; 1(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25802577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro assessment of wear particulate generated from NUBAC: a PEEK-on-PEEK articulating nucleus replacement device: methodology and results from a series of wear tests using different motion profiles, test frequencies, and environmental conditions.
Brown T; Bao QB; Agrawal CM; Hallab NJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1675-85. PubMed ID: 21494194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nucleus disc arthroplasty with the NUBAC™ device: 2-year clinical experience.
Balsano M; Zachos A; Ruggiu A; Barca F; Tranquilli-Leali P; Doria C
Eur Spine J; 2011 May; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-40. PubMed ID: 21416380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical and radiological follow-up of Nubac disc prosthesis. Preliminary report].
Alpízar-Aguirre A; Mireles-Cano JN; Rosales-Olivares M; Miramontes-Martínez V; Reyes-Sánchez A
Cir Cir; 2008; 76(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 18778542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An investigation into PEEK-on-PEEK as a bearing surface candidate for cervical total disc replacement.
Kraft M; Koch DK; Bushelow M
Spine J; 2012 Jul; 12(7):603-11. PubMed ID: 22964013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are PEEK-on-Ceramic Bearings an Option for Total Disc Arthroplasty? An In Vitro Tribology Study.
Siskey R; Ciccarelli L; Lui MK; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2428-2440. PubMed ID: 27677290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nucleus replacement with the DASCOR disc arthroplasty device: interim two-year efficacy and safety results from two prospective, non-randomized multicenter European studies.
Ahrens M; Tsantrizos A; Donkersloot P; Martens F; Lauweryns P; Le Huec JC; Moszko S; Fekete Z; Sherman J; Yuan HA; Halm H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(13):1376-84. PubMed ID: 19440167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Biologic Response to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Wear Particles in Total Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review.
Stratton-Powell AA; Pasko KM; Brockett CL; Tipper JL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2394-2404. PubMed ID: 27432420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lumbar disc arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year outcomes for patients in the Maverick disc investigational device exemption study.
Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH; Schranck FW; Copay AG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):347-356. PubMed ID: 31100723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2192-9. PubMed ID: 16205346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nubac disc arthroplasty via the posterior approach. Technical note.
Bucciero A
J Neurosurg Sci; 2010 Jun; 54(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 21313961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phase 1 evaluation of an elastomeric nucleus pulposus device as an option to augment disc at microdiscectomy: Experimental results from biomechanical and biocompatibility testing and first in human.
Chen X; Kohan S; Bhargav D; Choi J; Perera S; Dean C; Chopra N; Sial A; Sandhu HS; Apos E; Appleyard R; Diwan AD
JOR Spine; 2023 Jun; 6(2):e1250. PubMed ID: 37361335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.
Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Nanieva R; Fenk-Mayer A; Husted DS; Shah RV; Emerson JW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16506473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.
Gornet MF; Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Hodges SD; McConnell JR; Dryer RF; Copay AG; Nian H; Harrell FE
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):653-667. PubMed ID: 28304237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical and biomechanical characterization of a polyurethane nucleus replacement device injected and cured in situ within a balloon.
Tsantrizos A; Ordway NR; Myint K; Martz E; Yuan HA
SAS J; 2008; 2(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 25802599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
