These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25802578)
1. Anatomic Facet Replacement System (AFRS) Restoration of Lumbar Segment Mechanics to Intact: A Finite Element Study and In Vitro Cadaver Investigation. Goel VK; Mehta A; Jangra J; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Hoy RW; Fauth AR SAS J; 2007; 1(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 25802578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical Effect of L Cai XY; Sun MS; Huang YP; Liu ZX; Liu CJ; Du CF; Yang Q Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(3):917-930. PubMed ID: 32476282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Goel VK; Grauer JN; Patel TCh; Biyani A; Sairyo K; Vishnubhotla S; Matyas A; Cowgill I; Shaw M; Long R; Dick D; Panjabi MM; Serhan H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2755-64. PubMed ID: 16371899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments. Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis. Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments. Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element study of matched paired posterior disc implant and dynamic stabilizer (360° motion preservation system). Goel VK; Kiapour A; Faizan A; Krishna M; Friesem T SAS J; 2007; 1(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 25802579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine. Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system. Sjovold SG; Zhu Q; Bowden A; Larson CR; de Bakker PM; Villarraga ML; Ochoa JA; Rosler DM; Cripton PA Eur Spine J; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1660-73. PubMed ID: 22407270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Dooris AP; Goel VK; Grosland NM; Gilbertson LG; Wilder DG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):E122-9. PubMed ID: 11246394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system. Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanics of dynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness with lumbosacral fusion. Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Yaqoobi AS; Brasiliense LB; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep; 73(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 23756746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study. Erbulut DU; Zafarparandeh I; Hassan CR; Lazoglu I; Ozer AF J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective. Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study. Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A computational biomechanical investigation of posterior dynamic instrumentation: combination of dynamic rod and hinged (dynamic) screw. Erbulut DU; Kiapour A; Oktenoglu T; Ozer AF; Goel VK J Biomech Eng; 2014 May; 136(5):051007. PubMed ID: 24599026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator. Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]