These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25802580)
21. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Loumeau TP; Darden BV; Kesman TJ; Odum SM; Van Doren BA; Laxer EB; Murrey DB Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2263-70. PubMed ID: 26869078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relationship between the length of time off work preoperatively and clinical outcome at 24-month follow-up in patients undergoing total disc replacement or fusion. Rohan MX; Ohnmeiss DD; Guyer RD; Zigler JE; Blumenthal SL; Hochschuler SH; Sachs BL; Rashbaum RF Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):360-5. PubMed ID: 18809357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Five-year results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease. Zigler JE; Delamarter RB J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 23082846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Hannibal M; Thomas DJ; Low J; Hsu KY; Zucherman J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2322-6. PubMed ID: 17906573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion. Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical performance of an elastomeric lumbar disc replacement: Minimum 12 months follow-up. Pimenta L; Springmuller R; Lee CK; Oliveira L; Roth SE; Ogilvie WF SAS J; 2010; 4(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 25802645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. Coric D; Nunley PD; Guyer RD; Musante D; Carmody CN; Gordon CR; Lauryssen C; Ohnmeiss DD; Boltes MO J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):348-58. PubMed ID: 21699471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does 360° lumbar spinal fusion improve long-term clinical outcomes after failure of conservative treatment in patients with functionally disabling single-level degenerative lumbar disc disease? Results of 5-year follow-up in 75 postoperative patients. Zigler JE; Delamarter RB Int J Spine Surg; 2013; 7():e1-7. PubMed ID: 25694895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Motion preservation following total lumbar disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction: a prospective long-term clinical and radiographic investigation. Wuertinger C; Annes RDÀ; Hitzl W; Siepe CJ Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28673830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up. Guyer RD; Pettine K; Roh JS; Dimmig TA; Coric D; McAfee PC; Ohnmeiss DD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24718066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Early Clinical & Radiographic Results of NFix II Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System. Acosta FL; Christensen FB; Coe JD; Jahng TA; Kitchel SH; Meisel HJ; Schnöring M; Wingo CH; Ames CP SAS J; 2008; 2(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 25802605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site. Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of 2-Level Versus 1-Level Total Disc Replacement: Results From a Prospective FDA-Regulated Trial. Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD SAS J; 2008; 2(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 25802615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prospective randomized study of the Charite artificial disc: data from two investigational centers. Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Hochschuler SH; Blumenthal SL; Fedder IL; Ohnmeiss DD; Cunningham BW Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):252S-259S. PubMed ID: 15541674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]