These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25802676)

  • 1. Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
    Pettine K; Hersh A
    SAS J; 2011; 5(4):108-13. PubMed ID: 25802676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.
    Coric D; Nunley PD; Guyer RD; Musante D; Carmody CN; Gordon CR; Lauryssen C; Ohnmeiss DD; Boltes MO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):348-58. PubMed ID: 21699471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.
    Blumenthal S; McAfee PC; Guyer RD; Hochschuler SH; Geisler FH; Holt RT; Garcia R; Regan JJ; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. PubMed ID: 16025024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc.
    Coric D; Guyer RD; Nunley PD; Musante D; Carmody C; Gordon C; Lauryssen C; Boltes MO; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 29303467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up.
    Guyer RD; Pettine K; Roh JS; Dimmig TA; Coric D; McAfee PC; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
    Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lumbar disc arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year outcomes for patients in the Maverick disc investigational device exemption study.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH; Schranck FW; Copay AG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):347-356. PubMed ID: 31100723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
    Lu SB; Hai Y; Kong C; Wang QY; Su Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng XL; Wang Y
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 25895882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective randomized study of the Charite artificial disc: data from two investigational centers.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Hochschuler SH; Blumenthal SL; Fedder IL; Ohnmeiss DD; Cunningham BW
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):252S-259S. PubMed ID: 15541674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
    Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kineflex (centurion) lumbar disc prosthesis: insertion technique and 2-year clinical results in 100 patients.
    Hähnle UR; Weinberg IR; Sliwa K; Sweet BM; de Villiers M
    SAS J; 2007; 1(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 25802576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
    Geisler FH; Blumenthal SL; Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Regan JJ; Johnson JP; Mullin B
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep; 1(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 15346999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
    Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why Lumbar Artificial Disk Replacements (LADRs) Fail.
    Pettine K; Ryu R; Techy F
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):E743-E747. PubMed ID: 28632563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Five-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Lumbar Total Disc Replacements.
    Guyer RD; Pettine K; Roh JS; Dimmig TA; Coric D; McAfee PC; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 26335669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is Degenerative Spondylolisthesis a Contraindication for Total Disc Replacement? Kineflex Lumbar Disc Replacement in 7 Patients With 24-Month Follow-up.
    Hähnle UR; Sliwa K; de Villiers M; Weinberg IR; Sweet BM; Candy GP
    SAS J; 2008; 2(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 25802608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up.
    Shim CS; Lee SH; Shin HD; Kang HS; Choi WC; Jung B; Choi G; Ahn Y; Lee S; Lee HY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1012-8. PubMed ID: 17450077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.