BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25803086)

  • 1. Double bias: estimation of causal effects from length-biased samples in the presence of confounding.
    Ertefaie A; Asgharian M; Stephens DA
    Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):69-89. PubMed ID: 25803086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined estimating equation approaches for semiparametric transformation models with length-biased survival data.
    Cheng YJ; Huang CY
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):608-18. PubMed ID: 24750126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of restricted mean survival time for length-biased data.
    Lee CH; Ning J; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):575-583. PubMed ID: 28886217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accelerated failure time model under general biased sampling scheme.
    Kim JP; Sit T; Ying Z
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jul; 17(3):576-88. PubMed ID: 26941240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semiparametric Accelerated Failure Time Model for Length-biased Data with Application to Dementia Study.
    Ning J; Qin J; Shen Y
    Stat Sin; 2014 Jan; 24(1):313-333. PubMed ID: 24478570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Buckley-James-type estimator with right-censored and length-biased data.
    Ning J; Qin J; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1369-78. PubMed ID: 21385160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonparametric and semiparametric estimators of restricted mean survival time under length-biased sampling.
    He Y; Zhou Y
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2020 Oct; 26(4):761-788. PubMed ID: 32300909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.
    Qin R; Titler MG; Shever LL; Kim T
    Nurs Res; 2008; 57(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 19018219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Propensity Score Estimation in the Presence of Length-biased Sampling: A Nonparametric Adjustment Approach.
    Ertefaie A; Asgharian M; Stephens D
    Stat; 2014 Jan; 3(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 25170178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information in the sample covariate distribution in prevalent cohorts.
    Cook RJ; Bergeron PJ
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(12):1397-409. PubMed ID: 21259303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the propensity score weighting analysis with survival outcome: Estimands, estimation, and inference.
    Mao H; Li L; Yang W; Shen Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(26):3745-3763. PubMed ID: 29855060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.
    Gayat E; Resche-Rigon M; Mary JY; Porcher R
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 22411785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.
    Austin PC; Thomas N; Rubin DB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):728-751. PubMed ID: 30569832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Sensitivity Analyses for Unobserved Confounding to Address Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.
    Rudolph KE; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 187(3):604-613. PubMed ID: 28992211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Time-dependent confounding in the estimation of treatment effects in randomised trials with multimodal therapies--an illustration of the problem of time-dependent confounding by causal graphs].
    Zietemann VD; Schuster T; Duell TH
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Jan; 77(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 24203687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity Score Methods for Analyzing Observational Data Like Randomized Experiments: Challenges and Solutions for Rare Outcomes and Exposures.
    Ross ME; Kreider AR; Huang YS; Matone M; Rubin DM; Localio AR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 181(12):989-95. PubMed ID: 25995287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.
    Little RJ; Rubin DB
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2000; 21():121-45. PubMed ID: 10884949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Causal estimation using semiparametric transformation models under prevalent sampling.
    Cheng YJ; Wang MC
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 25715045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.