BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25803219)

  • 1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Lumbosacral Spine Magnetic Resonance Image Reading by Chiropractors, Chiropractic Radiologists, and Medical Radiologists.
    de Zoete A; Ostelo R; Knol DL; Algra PR; Wilmink JT; van Tulder MW;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):E653-60. PubMed ID: 25803219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of lumbosacral spine radiograph reading by chiropractors, chiropractic radiologists, and medical radiologists.
    de Zoete A; Assendelft WJ; Algra PR; Oberman WR; Vanderschueren GM; Bezemer PD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Sep; 27(17):1926-33; discussion 1933. PubMed ID: 12221360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of abnormal lumbosacral spine radiographs. A test comparing students, clinicians, radiology residents, and radiologists in medicine and chiropractic.
    Taylor JA; Clopton P; Bosch E; Miller KA; Marcelis S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 May; 20(10):1147-53; discussion 1154. PubMed ID: 7638657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of lumbar spine radiograph reading by chiropractors.
    Assendelft WJ; Bouter LM; Knipschild PG; Wilmink JT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1235-41. PubMed ID: 9201862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior disk displacement: morphologic assessment and measurement reliability-lumbar spine.
    Cooley JR; Danielson CD; Schultz GD; Hall TA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Jun; 24(5):317-26. PubMed ID: 11416821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sagittal whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging in 750 consecutive outpatients: accurate determination of the number of lumbar vertebral bodies.
    Hanson EH; Mishra RK; Chang DS; Perkins TG; Bonifield DR; Tandy RD; Cartwright PE; Peoples RR; Orrison WW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jan; 12(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20043764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical examination, magnetic resonance image, and electrodiagnostic study in patients with lumbosacral disc herniation or spinal stenosis.
    Lee JH; Lee SH
    J Rehabil Med; 2012 Oct; 44(10):845-50. PubMed ID: 22930153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and interobserver agreement between MR-non-expert radiologists and MR-experts in reading MRI for suspected appendicitis.
    Leeuwenburgh MM; Wiarda BM; Jensch S; van Es HW; Stockmann HB; Gratama JW; Cobben LP; Bossuyt PM; Boermeester MA; Stoker J;
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 24168926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain.
    French SD; Green S; Forbes A
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 May; 23(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 10820295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low back pain and the lumbar intervertebral disk: clinical considerations for the doctor of chiropractic.
    Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DD; Harrison DE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1999 Feb; 22(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 10073625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of MRI findings in the cervical spine in patients with persistent neck pain based on quantification of narrative MRI reports.
    Jensen RK; Jensen TS; Grøn S; Frafjord E; Bundgaard U; Damsgaard AL; Mathiasen JM; Kjaer P
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():13. PubMed ID: 30873276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observer variability based on the strength of MR scanners in the assessment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.
    Cihangiroglu M; Yildirim H; Bozgeyik Z; Senol U; Ozdemir H; Topsakal C; Yilmaz S
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 15294326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observer variability in the evaluation of multiple lumbar stenosis by routine MR--myelography and MRI.
    Song KS; Jang EC; Jung HJ; Kim KW; Yu H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Dec; 21(8):569-74. PubMed ID: 19057250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlative analysis of reliability and validity of plain radiology, MOS short-form health survey and surgical examination in making decision for treatment of chronic low back pain patients.
    Korovessis P; Dimas A; Koureas G; Zacharatos S; Petsinis G; Baikousis A
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2004 Sep; 14(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 27517178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar disc disease.
    Patel PR; Lauerman WC
    Orthop Nurs; 1997; 16(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 9110821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of acute and chronic patients with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed symptomatic lumbar disc herniations receiving high-velocity, low-amplitude, spinal manipulative therapy: a prospective observational cohort study with one-year follow-up.
    Leemann S; Peterson CK; Schmid C; Anklin B; Humphreys BK
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014; 37(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 24636109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement in the interpretation of magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine.
    Kovacs FM; Royuela A; Jensen TS; Estremera A; Amengual G; Muriel A; Galarraga I; Martínez C; Arana E; Sarasíbar H; Salgado RM; Abraira V; López O; Campillo C; del Real MT; Zamora J
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):497-506. PubMed ID: 19431057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining independent decisions increases diagnostic accuracy of reading lumbosacral radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kurvers RHJM; de Zoete A; Bachman SL; Algra PR; Ostelo R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194128. PubMed ID: 29614070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbar spine: agreement in the interpretation of 1.5-T MR images by using the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification form.
    Arana E; Royuela A; Kovacs FM; Estremera A; Sarasíbar H; Amengual G; Galarraga I; Martínez C; Muriel A; Abraira V; Gil Del Real MT; Zamora J; Campillo C
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):809-17. PubMed ID: 20123897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.