These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25803219)

  • 21. Chiropractic utilization of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging: how accurate are we compared with other specialties?
    Kilmer SE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 9567237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Observer variation in plain radiography of the lumbosacral spine.
    Espeland A; Korsbrekke K; Albrektsen G; Larsen JL
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):366-75. PubMed ID: 9659128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of imaging procedures in the diagnosis of metastatic disease of the lumbar spine.
    Defoyd WD
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990; 13(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 2140124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do chiropractors adhere to guidelines for back radiographs? A study of chiropractic teaching clinics in Canada.
    Ammendolia C; Côté P; Hogg-Johnson S; Bombardier C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2509-14. PubMed ID: 18090093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interobserver reliability in the interpretation of diagnostic lumbar MRI and nuclear imaging.
    Mulconrey DS; Knight RQ; Bramble JD; Paknikar S; Harty PA
    Spine J; 2006; 6(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 16517390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A physiological approach to the evaluation of lumbosacral spinal stenosis.
    Kraft GH
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 1998 May; 9(2):381-9, viii. PubMed ID: 9894123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Aprill C; Bogduk N
    Br J Radiol; 1992 May; 65(773):361-9. PubMed ID: 1535257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validity of the straight-leg raise test for patients with sciatic pain with or without lumbar pain using magnetic resonance imaging results as a reference standard.
    Capra F; Vanti C; Donati R; Tombetti S; O'Reilly C; Pillastrini P
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 May; 34(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 21621724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Moderate versus mediocre: the reliability of spine MR data interpretations.
    Jarvik JG; Deyo RA
    Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 19092086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patient characteristics, practice activities, and one-month outcomes for chronic, recurrent low-back pain treated by chiropractors and family medicine physicians: a practice-based feasibility study.
    Nyiendo J; Haas M; Goodwin P
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 May; 23(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 10820296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Role of MR imaging in the evaluation of low back pain (orthopedic surgeon's view).
    Taneichi H
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2001 Jun; 5(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 11510457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine with axial loading: a review of 120 cases.
    Kinder A; Filho FP; Ribeiro E; Domingues RC; Domingues RC; Marchiori E; Gasparetto E
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e561-4. PubMed ID: 21741192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chiropractic radiologists: a survey of chiropractors' attitudes and patterns of use.
    Harger BL; Taylor JA; Haas M; Nyiendo J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Jun; 20(5):311-4. PubMed ID: 9200045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Observer agreement of spine stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging analysis of patients with cervical spine myelopathy.
    Cook C; Braga-Baiak A; Pietrobon R; Shah A; Neto AC; de Barros N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 May; 31(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 18486747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of straight leg raise and slump tests in detecting lumbar disc herniation: a pilot study.
    M'kumbuzi VR; Ntawukuriryayo JT; Haminana JD; Munyandamutsa J; Nzakizwanimana E
    Cent Afr J Med; 2012; 58(1-4):5-11. PubMed ID: 26255334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of side-posture positioning and side-posture adjusting on the lumbar zygapophysial joints as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging: a before and after study with randomization.
    Cramer GD; Tuck NR; Knudsen JT; Fonda SD; Schliesser JS; Fournier JT; Patel P
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000; 23(6):380-94. PubMed ID: 10951308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables.
    Mariconda M; Galasso O; Imbimbo L; Lotti G; Milano C
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Feb; 16(2):255-66. PubMed ID: 16835739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Lumboischialgia due to intradural lumbar disc herniation].
    Füssel S; Janka M; Unterpaintner I; Schuh A
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2015 May; 157(10):5. PubMed ID: 26019063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
    Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images of the lumbar spine - an intra- and inter-observer reproducibility study.
    Doktor K; Vilholm ML; Hardardóttir A; Christensen HW; Lauritsen J
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():20. PubMed ID: 31069046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.