627 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25803240)
1. Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.
Rudokas J; Miller PJ; Trail MA; Russell AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5170-7. PubMed ID: 25803240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part II: Air quality projections and the interplay between emissions and climate change.
Campbell P; Zhang Y; Yan F; Lu Z; Streets D
Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():918-930. PubMed ID: 29684896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expected ozone benefits of reducing nitrogen oxide (NO
Vinciguerra T; Bull E; Canty T; He H; Zalewsky E; Woodman M; Aburn G; Ehrman S; Dickerson RR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 27650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for climate and air quality damages in future U.S. electricity generation scenarios.
Brown KE; Henze DK; Milford JB
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(7):3065-72. PubMed ID: 23465362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impacts of potential CO2-reduction policies on air quality in the United States.
Trail MA; Tsimpidi AP; Liu P; Tsigaridis K; Hu Y; Rudokas JR; Miller PJ; Nenes A; Russell AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5133-41. PubMed ID: 25811418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units.
Evans DA; Hobbs BF; Oren C; Palmer KL
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 18284129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States.
Robinson AL; Rhodes JS; Keith DW
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5081-9. PubMed ID: 14655692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part I: Projected emissions, simulation design, and model evaluation.
Campbell P; Zhang Y; Yan F; Lu Z; Streets D
Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():903-917. PubMed ID: 29677550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accelerated reduction in SO₂ emissions from the U.S. power sector triggered by changing prices of natural gas.
Lu X; McElroy MB; Wu G; Nielsen CP
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7882-9. PubMed ID: 22724530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental impact of national and subnational carbon policies in China based on a multi-regional dynamic CGE model.
Zhang WW; Zhao B; Gu Y; Sharp B; Xu SC; Liou KN
J Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 270():110901. PubMed ID: 32721336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tackling air pollution and extreme climate changes in China: Implementing the Paris climate change agreement.
Tambo E; Duo-Quan W; Zhou XN
Environ Int; 2016 Oct; 95():152-6. PubMed ID: 27107974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emissions impacts of wind and energy storage in a market environment.
Sioshansi R
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10728-35. PubMed ID: 22044253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits of current and future policies on emissions of China's coal-fired power sector indicated by continuous emission monitoring.
Zhang Y; Bo X; Zhao Y; Nielsen CP
Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():415-424. PubMed ID: 31103001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-carbon electricity generation-based dynamic equilibrium strategy for carbon dioxide emissions reduction in the coal-fired power enterprise.
Xu J; Feng Q; Lv C; Huang Q
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Dec; 26(36):36732-36753. PubMed ID: 31741269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compilation and application of Japanese inventories for energy consumption and air pollutant emissions using input-output tables.
Nansai K; Moriguchi Y; Tohno S
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 May; 37(9):2005-15. PubMed ID: 12775078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Air quality and climate connections.
Fiore AM; Naik V; Leibensperger EM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Jun; 65(6):645-85. PubMed ID: 25976481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
