BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25803370)

  • 41. Frequency of precancerous changes and cervical cancer recorded in three health centres in tuzla canton in period 2010-2011.
    Jahic M; Mulavdic M; Dautbasic F; Fejzic M; Jahic E
    Mater Sociomed; 2013 Dec; 25(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 24511270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cervical Smears at Public Health Centres in Eastern Trinidad: Coverage and Follow-up, 2009-2010.
    Lynch-George G; Maharaj RG
    West Indian Med J; 2014 Jul; 63(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 25803370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
    Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
    Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prevalence of Abnormal Pap Smears: A Descriptive Study from a Cancer Center in a Low-Prevalence Community.
    Maraqa B; Lataifeh I; Otay L; Badran O; Qutaiba Nouri Y; Issam I; Al Hussaini M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(11):3117-3121. PubMed ID: 29172288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
    Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Correlation of Papanicolaou Smears and Clinical Features to Identify the Common Risk Factors for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective and Descriptive Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Trinidad.
    Umakanthan S; Bukelo MM; Ghany S; Gay D; Gilkes T; Freeman J; Francis A; Francis K; Gajadhar G; Fraser J
    Vaccines (Basel); 2023 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 36992281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.
    Ferlay J; Shin HR; Bray F; Forman D; Mathers C; Parkin DM
    Int J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 127(12):2893-917. PubMed ID: 21351269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Challenges faced by cervical cancer prevention programs in developing countries: a situational analysis of program organization in Argentina.
    Arrossi S; Paolino M; Sankaranarayanan R
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2010 Oct; 28(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 21152712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Perspectives on Pap test follow-up care among rural Appalachian women.
    Schoenberg N; Baltisberger J; Bardach S; Dignan M
    Women Health; 2010 Sep; 50(6):580-97. PubMed ID: 20981638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cervical cancer assessment in Romania under EUROCHIP-2.
    Apostol I; Baban A; Nicula F; Suteu O; Coza D; Amati C; Baili P;
    Tumori; 2010; 96(4):545-52. PubMed ID: 20968133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Evaluation of the follow-up of women aged 50-74 years after cervical cytological Ascus abnormalities in cancer screening: adherence to clinical practice guidelines in Isere, France; 1991-2000].
    Billette-de-Villemeur A; Poncet F; Garnier A; Marron J; Le Marc'hadour F; Morens A; Rouault-Plantaz V; Ney M; Exbrayat C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Oct; 37(10):787-95. PubMed ID: 19782628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cervical cancer screening programs in Latin America and the Caribbean.
    Murillo R; Almonte M; Pereira A; Ferrer E; Gamboa OA; Jerónimo J; Lazcano-Ponce E
    Vaccine; 2008 Aug; 26 Suppl 11():L37-48. PubMed ID: 18945401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Variations in practice guideline adherence for abnormal cervical cytology in a county healthcare system.
    Singhal R; Rubenstein LV; Wang M; Lee ML; Raza A; Holschneider CH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2008 May; 23(5):575-80. PubMed ID: 18286344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Factors affecting uptake of cervical cancer screening among clinic attendees in Trelawny, Jamaica.
    Bessler P; Aung M; Jolly P
    Cancer Control; 2007 Oct; 14(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 17914340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A participatory assessment to identify strategies for improved cervical cancer prevention and treatment in Bolivia.
    Dzuba IG; Calderón R; Bliesner S; Luciani S; Amado F; Jacob M
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2005 Jul; 18(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 16105327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Situation analysis for cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment in east, central and southern African countries.
    Chirenje ZM; Rusakaniko S; Kirumbi L; Ngwalle EW; Makuta-Tlebere P; Kaggwa S; Mpanju-Shumbusho W; Makoae L
    Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11242819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.