300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25803484)
1. Anaerobic degradation of dairy wastewater in intermittent UASB reactors: influence of effluent recirculation.
Couras CS; Louros VL; Gameiro T; Alves N; Silva A; Capela MI; Arroja LM; Nadais H
Environ Technol; 2015; 36(17):2227-38. PubMed ID: 25803484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of pentachlorophenol and chemical oxygen demand mass concentrations in influent on operational behaviors of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.
Shen DS; He R; Liu XW; Long Y
J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 16513261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dual purpose packed-bed reactor for biogas scrubbing and methane-dependent water quality improvement applying to a wastewater treatment system consisting of UASB reactor and trickling filter.
Tanaka Y
Bioresour Technol; 2002 Aug; 84(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12137264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intermittent vs continuous operation of upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactors for dairy wastewater and related microbial changes.
Nadais H; Capela I; Arroja L
Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 16939090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioelectrochemical enhancement of direct interspecies electron transfer in upflow anaerobic reactor with effluent recirculation for acidic distillery wastewater.
Feng Q; Song YC; Yoo K; Kuppanan N; Subudhi S; Lal B
Bioresour Technol; 2017 Oct; 241():171-180. PubMed ID: 28554103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of staged and non-staged up-flow anaerobic sludge bed (USSB and UASB) reactors treating low strength complex wastewater.
Sevilla-Espinosa S; Solórzano-Campo M; Bello-Mendoza R
Biodegradation; 2010 Sep; 21(5):737-51. PubMed ID: 20174990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kinetics of anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater in batch and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor.
Rodríguez-Martínez J; Rodríguez-Garza I; Pedraza-Flores E; Balagurusamy N; Sosa-Santillan G; Garza-García Y
Bioresour Technol; 2002 Dec; 85(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 12365489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of sludge recirculation rate on a UASB-digester treating domestic sewage at 15 °C.
Zhang L; Hendrickx TL; Kampman C; Zeeman G; Temmink H; Li W; Buisman CJ
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(12):2597-603. PubMed ID: 23109575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory scale and pilot plant study on treatment of toxic wastewater from the petrochemical industry by UASB reactors.
Stergar V; Zagorc-Koncan J; Zgajnar-Gotvanj A
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):97-102. PubMed ID: 14682575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimum cycle time for intermittent UASB reactors treating dairy wastewater.
Nadais H; Capela I; Arroja L; Duarte A
Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(8):1511-8. PubMed ID: 15878022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of UASB reactors operation mode on the removal of estrone and 17α-ethinylestradiol from wastewaters.
Louros VL; Lima DLD; Leitão JH; Esteves VI; Nadais HGA
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Apr; 764():144291. PubMed ID: 33401048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Membrane installation for enhanced up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) performance.
Liu Y; Zhang K; Bakke R; Li C; Liu H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2013 Sep; 116(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 23578587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cumulative effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in UASB process during wastewater treatment.
Cervantes-Avilés P; Durán Vargas JB; Akizuki S; Kodera T; Ida J; Cuevas-Rodríguez G
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 277():111428. PubMed ID: 33035936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of non-feeding period length on the intermittent operation of UASB reactors treating dairy effluents.
Coelho NM; Rodrigues AA; Arroja LM; Capela IF
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Feb; 96(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 16900520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microbial granules on reactors performance during organic butyrate digestion: clean production.
Ahmad A; Ghufran R
Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2023 Dec; 43(8):1236-1256. PubMed ID: 36130802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative long-term operation using up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for the upgrading of anaerobic treatment of N, N-dimethylformamide-containing wastewater.
Li L; Kong Z; Xue Y; Wang T; Kato H; Li YY
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jan; 699():134370. PubMed ID: 31678883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An advanced anaerobic biofilter with effluent recirculation for phenol removal and methane production in treatment of coal gasification wastewater.
Li Y; Tabassum S; Zhang Z
J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Sep; 47():23-33. PubMed ID: 27593269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimates of methane loss and energy recovery potential in anaerobic reactors treating domestic wastewater.
Lobato LC; Chernicharo CA; Souza CL
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(12):2745-53. PubMed ID: 23109594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of alkalinity and VFAs on the performance of an UASB reactor with recirculation for the treatment of Tequila vinasses.
López-López A; León-Becerril E; Rosales-Contreras ME; Villegas-García E
Environ Technol; 2015; 36(19):2468-76. PubMed ID: 25827467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]