212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25804111)
1. [Referral for mammography often not according to guideline].
Lodder-van der Vlies D; Droogh-de Greve K; de Win JL; van der Zaag-Loonen HJ; van Bruggen JA; Markestein HP; Gratama JW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8636. PubMed ID: 25804111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Mammographic surveillance of breast cancer patient relatives; implementation of guidelines formulated by the Netherlands College of General Practitioners].
Duijm LE; Zaat JO; Guit GL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Apr; 142(14):778-81. PubMed ID: 9646610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic surveillance of asymptomatic breast cancer relatives in general practice: rate of re-attendance and GP- and patient-related barriers.
Duijm LE; Guit GL; Zaat JO
Fam Pract; 1997 Dec; 14(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 9476075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Summary of the practice guideline 'Diagnosis of breast cancer' (second revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners].
Wiersma T; de Bock GH; Corsten MC; Scheele ME; Goudswaard AN
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A154. PubMed ID: 19818178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.
Otten JD; van Dijck JA; Peer PG; Straatman H; Verbeek AL; Mravunac M; Hendriks JH; Holland R
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Jun; 50(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 8935470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The general practitioner's role in breast cancer screening: a survey in Otago-Southland.
Miller D; McNoe B; Elwood M; Doyle TC
N Z Med J; 1998 Feb; 111(1059):24-8. PubMed ID: 9506667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care.
Timmers JM; den Heeten GJ; Adang EM; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
Eur J Public Health; 2012 Dec; 22(6):925-9. PubMed ID: 22158996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Summary of the Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline 'Diagnosis of breast cancer'].
Wiersma T; de Bock GH; Assendelft WJ;
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Mar; 147(12):547-50. PubMed ID: 12693083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of the general practitioner in breast cancer screening in The Netherlands.
Aalders CJ; Schadé E
J Cancer Educ; 1991; 6(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 1931597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer screening in women aged 50-74 years: is there room for improvement?
Morère JF; Pivot X; Viguier J; Blay JY; Calazel-Benque A; Coscas Y; Roussel C; Eisinger F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Jan; 20 Suppl 1():S8-S12. PubMed ID: 21245683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography--an innovative community project.
Eilat-Tsanani S; Sorek M; Gay N; Chaimovitch O; Kulton L; Tabenkin H
Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 11794915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF Guideline.
Wernli KJ; Arao RF; Hubbard RA; Sprague BL; Alford-Teaster J; Haas JS; Henderson L; Hill D; Lee CI; Tosteson ANA; Onega T
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Aug; 26(8):820-827. PubMed ID: 28177856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary care providers' concerns and recommendations regarding mammography screening for older women.
Sharp PC; Michielutte R; Spangler JG; Cunningham L; Freimanis R
J Cancer Educ; 2005; 20(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 15876180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
