183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25804528)
1. Cross-Cultural Validity and Differential Item Functioning of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey With Swedish and United States Users of Lower-Limb Prosthesis.
Jarl G; Heinemann AW; Lindner HY; Norling Hermansson LM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Sep; 96(9):1615-26. PubMed ID: 25804528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users.
Burger H; Giordano A; Mlakar M; Albensi C; Brezovar D; Franchignoni F
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 May; 62(3):168-173. PubMed ID: 30965159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity evidence for a modified version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Jarl GM; Heinemann AW; Norling Hermansson LM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Nov; 7(6):469-78. PubMed ID: 22439801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation.
Bakhsh HR; Kablan N; Alammar W; Tatar Y; Ferriero G
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 19(1):134. PubMed ID: 33906680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test-retest reliability of the Swedish version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Jarl G; Holmefur M; Hermansson LM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 23652919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring Satisfaction With Upper Limb Prostheses: Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey Revision That Includes Issues of Concern to Women.
Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Clark MA; Heinemann AW; Ni P
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 103(12):2316-2324. PubMed ID: 35705138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Italian version of the Client Satisfaction with Device module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Bravini E; Franchignoni F; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Bakhsh H; Sartorio F; Vercelli S
Disabil Health J; 2014 Oct; 7(4):442-7. PubMed ID: 25224984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the satisfaction module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Demirdel S; Ulaş K; Erol Çelik S; Karahan S; Topuz S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Apr; 46(2):170-174. PubMed ID: 34840278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric properties of the Client Satisfaction with Device module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a scoping review.
Sorrentino G; Vercelli S; Salgovic L; Ronconi G; Bakhsh HR; Ferriero G
Int J Rehabil Res; 2021 Sep; 44(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 34356037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation and validation of the Malay version of modified orthotics and prosthetics users' survey.
Hashim NM; Che Daud AZ; Ibrahim AH; Ab Majid MH; Mohd Ghazali MN; Abdul Razak MM; Mohd Rusli MR
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Jan; 48(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 37639558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the Arabic version of the client satisfaction with device module of the orthotics and prosthetics users survey.
Bakhsh H; Franchignoni F; Bravini E; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Foti C
Ann Saudi Med; 2014; 34(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 25811205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation.
Burger H; Franchignoni F; Heinemann AW; Kotnik S; Giordano A
J Rehabil Med; 2008 May; 40(5):393-9. PubMed ID: 18461266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (A-QUEST 2.0) in prosthesis users.
Kablan N; Bakhsh HR; Alammar W; Tatar Y; Ferriero G
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Feb; 58(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 34247472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Persian version of satisfaction assessment module of Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Hadadi M; Ghoseiri K; Fardipour S; Kashani RV; Asadi F; Asghari A
Disabil Health J; 2016 Jan; 9(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 26476934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity, reliability, and Rasch analysis of the orthotics and prosthetics users' survey: Turkish version of the lower-extremity functional status.
Soyer K; Demirdel S; Erol Çelik S; Topuz S; Karahan S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Jun; 47(3):307-312. PubMed ID: 36806320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales: a psychometric assessment using classical test theory and rasch analysis.
Gallagher P; Franchignoni F; Giordano A; MacLachlan M
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 89(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 20489393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review on cross-cultural validations and psychometric solidity of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey.
Valero JM; Satústegui PJ; Salavera CE; Sanz López V; Laborda AA; Hidalgo C
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Jan; 48(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 37639569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale With 5-Option Response Format in Slovene Lower-Limb Prosthetic Users.
Franchignoni F; Bavec A; Zupanc U; Giordano A; Albensi C; Burger H
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Apr; 102(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 33227265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability of the Dutch translation of the OPUS' client satisfaction with device module in chronic users of hand orthoses.
Oud T; Tuijtelaars J; Schenk J; Nollet F; Brehm MA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 Aug; 21(1):93. PubMed ID: 37605151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validating a fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance scale in lower limb prosthesis users.
Rosenblatt NJ; Major MJ; Manesh B; Schneider K; Miller SA
PM R; 2024 May; 16(5):462-473. PubMed ID: 37632836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
