313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25806520)
1. Conspicuous female ornamentation and tests of male mate preference in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).
Wright DS; Pierotti ME; Rundle HD; McKinnon JS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120723. PubMed ID: 25806520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Male red ornamentation is associated with female red sensitivity in sticklebacks.
Rick IP; Mehlis M; Bakker TC
PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e25554. PubMed ID: 21984930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mate choice, sexual imprinting, and speciation: a test of a one-allele isolating mechanism in sympatric sticklebacks.
Albert AY
Evolution; 2005 Apr; 59(4):927-31. PubMed ID: 15926703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice.
Smith C; Barber I; Wootton RJ; Chittka L
Proc Biol Sci; 2004 May; 271(1542):949-55. PubMed ID: 15255050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Color signaling in conspicuous red sticklebacks: do ultraviolet signals surpass others?
Rick IP; Bakker TC
BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 8():189. PubMed ID: 18593461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Female stickleback prefer shallow males: Sexual selection on nest microhabitat.
Bolnick DI; Shim KC; Brock CD
Evolution; 2015 Jun; 69(6):1643-1653. PubMed ID: 25958935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonlinear effects of female mate choice in wild threespine sticklebacks.
Blais J; Rico C; Bernatchez L
Evolution; 2004 Nov; 58(11):2498-510. PubMed ID: 15612293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequential mate choice and sexual isolation in threespine stickleback species.
Kozak GM; Head ML; Lackey AC; Boughman JW
J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 23194003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Body size differences do not arise from divergent mate preferences in a species pair of threespine stickleback.
Head ML; Price EA; Boughman JW
Biol Lett; 2009 Aug; 5(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 19474072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection?
Albert AY; Schluter D
Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15212390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks?
Candolin U; Salesto T
Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 19117472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic Architecture of Conspicuous Red Ornaments in Female Threespine Stickleback.
Yong L; Peichel CL; McKinnon JS
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Dec; 6(3):579-88. PubMed ID: 26715094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sperm quality but not relatedness predicts sperm competition success in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).
Mehlis M; Rahn AK; Bakker TC
BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Apr; 15():74. PubMed ID: 25928309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrastructural analysis of throat dermal tissue and chromatophore components in the threespine stickleback (
Anderson CM; Fink T; McKinnon JS
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16248. PubMed ID: 38077425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.
Head ML; Kozak GM; Boughman JW
Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2183-96. PubMed ID: 23919161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Females sample more males at high nesting densities, but ultimately obtain less attractive mates.
Tinghitella RM; Stehle C; Boughman JW
BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 15():200. PubMed ID: 26385337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sex Differences in Laterality Are Associated with Reproduction in Threespine Stickleback.
McLean S; Morrell LJ
Am Nat; 2021 Jun; 197(6):708-718. PubMed ID: 33989139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.
Conte GL; Schluter D
Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1477-84. PubMed ID: 23617922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shoal sex composition and predation risk influence sub-adult threespine stickleback shoaling decisions.
Rystrom TL; Clement VF; Rick IP; Bakker TCM; Mehlis M
Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():495-501. PubMed ID: 29933058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
