These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2580694)

  • 1. ERPs to response production and inhibition.
    Pfefferbaum A; Ford JM; Weller BJ; Kopell BS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1985 May; 60(5):423-34. PubMed ID: 2580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERPs to stimuli requiring response production and inhibition: effects of age, probability and visual noise.
    Pfefferbaum A; Ford JM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 2446846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apparent response incompatibility effects on P3 latency depend on the task.
    Pfefferbaum A; Christensen C; Ford JM; Kopell BS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Nov; 64(5):424-37. PubMed ID: 2428593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Go and no-go P3 with rare and frequent stimuli in oddball tasks: A study comparing key-pressing with counting.
    Verleger R; Grauhan N; Śmigasiewicz K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():128-136. PubMed ID: 27845155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task.
    Jodo E; Kayama Y
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Jun; 82(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 1375556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of education level on design-induced N170 and P300 components of event related potentials in the human brain.
    Begum T; Reza F; Ahmed I; Abdullah JM
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 13(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 24738540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Event-related potentials to response production and inhibition in go/nogo task. I. Topographical characteristics to different visual stimulus sequences].
    Kaga Y; Iwadare Y; Noguchi S; Tando T; Aihara M
    No To Hattatsu; 2008 Jan; 40(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 18210859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of incense on brain function: evaluation using electroencephalograms and event-related potentials.
    Iijima M; Osawa M; Nishitani N; Iwata M
    Neuropsychobiology; 2009; 59(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 19325250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of fetal alcohol syndrome on response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Burden MJ; Andrew C; Saint-Amour D; Meintjes EM; Molteno CD; Hoyme HE; Robinson LK; Khaole N; Nelson CA; Jacobson JL; Jacobson SW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 19719791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential modulation of the N2 and P3 event-related potentials by response conflict and inhibition.
    Groom MJ; Cragg L
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jul; 97():1-9. PubMed ID: 25955278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17604142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diversity of the P3 in the task-switching paradigm.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1411():87-97. PubMed ID: 21803343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 23073074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 15653295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing food-related inhibitory control to high- and low-calorie food stimuli: Electrophysiological responses to high-calorie food stimuli predict calorie and carbohydrate intake.
    Carbine KA; Christensen E; LeCheminant JD; Bailey BW; Tucker LA; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jul; 54(7):982-997. PubMed ID: 28338210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aging and respond-withhold tasks: effects on sustained potentials, P3 responses and late activity.
    Podlesny JA; Dustman RE; Shearer DE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Aug; 58(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 6204839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of negatively valenced words on deviant P3 during the three-stimulus oddball paradigm.
    Ishida M; Kaneda M; Akamine A; Sakakibara M
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 683():38-42. PubMed ID: 29906482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.