These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25807317)

  • 1. Response to Comments on "Estimating Risks of Low Radiation Doses-A Critical Review of the BEIR VII Report and Its Use of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Hypothesis".
    O'Connor MK; Calabrese EJ
    Radiat Res; 2015 Apr; 183(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 25807317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on Estimating Risks of Low Radiation Doses-A Critical Review of the BEIR VII Report and Its Use of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Hypothesis by Edward J. Calabrese and Michael K. O'Connor.
    Crowley KD; Cullings HM; Landes RD; Shore RE; Ullrich RL
    Radiat Res; 2015 Apr; 183(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 25807319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating risk of low radiation doses - a critical review of the BEIR VII report and its use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
    Calabrese EJ; O'Connor MK
    Radiat Res; 2014 Nov; 182(5):463-74. PubMed ID: 25329961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of low-dose radiation and the BEIR VII report: A critical review of what it does and doesn't say.
    O'Connor MK
    Phys Med; 2017 Nov; 43():153-158. PubMed ID: 28826776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The BEIR VII Estimates of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks Are Based on Faulty Assumptions and Data Analyses: A Call for Reassessment.
    Siegel JA; Greenspan BS; Maurer AH; Taylor AT; Phillips WT; Van Nostrand D; Sacks B; Silberstein EB
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1017-1019. PubMed ID: 29475999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Preston RJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18849687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.
    Boice JD
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 28532210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comments on the DDREF estimate of the BEIR VII Committee.
    Hoel DG
    Health Phys; 2015 Mar; 108(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 25627947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Gofman-Tamplin Cancer Risk Controversy and Its Impact on the Creation of BEIR I and the Acceptance of LNT.
    Calabrese E
    Med Lav; 2023 Feb; 114(1):e2023007. PubMed ID: 36790405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A contribution to the linear no-threshold discussion.
    Chadwick KH; Leenhouts HP; Brugmans MJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2003 Mar; 23(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 12729419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cancer incidence and mortality after low-dose radiation exposure: epidemiological aspects].
    Vaĭserman A; Mekhova LV; Koshel' NM; Voĭtenko VP
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2010; 50(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 21434396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.
    Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 16470411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Oct; 241():289-302. PubMed ID: 29843011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation?
    Wall BF; Kendall GM; Edwards AA; Bouffler S; Muirhead CR; Meara JR
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):285-94. PubMed ID: 16585719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Critical Assessment of the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: What Is the Evidence?
    Colletti PM
    Clin Nucl Med; 2019 Jul; 44(7):519-520. PubMed ID: 31107748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
    Charles MW
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.