272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25808779)
1. Analysis of the tomato leaf transcriptome during successive hemibiotrophic stages of a compatible interaction with the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans.
Zuluaga AP; Vega-Arreguín JC; Fei Z; Matas AJ; Patev S; Fry WE; Rose JK
Mol Plant Pathol; 2016 Jan; 17(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 25808779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transcriptional dynamics of Phytophthora infestans during sequential stages of hemibiotrophic infection of tomato.
Zuluaga AP; Vega-Arreguín JC; Fei Z; Ponnala L; Lee SJ; Matas AJ; Patev S; Fry WE; Rose JK
Mol Plant Pathol; 2016 Jan; 17(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 25845484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physiological and RNA-seq analyses provide insights into the response mechanism of the Cf-10-mediated resistance to Cladosporium fulvum infection in tomato.
Liu G; Liu J; Zhang C; You X; Zhao T; Jiang J; Chen X; Zhang H; Yang H; Zhang D; Du C; Li J; Xu X
Plant Mol Biol; 2018 Mar; 96(4-5):403-416. PubMed ID: 29383477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcriptome signatures of tomato leaf induced by Phytophthora infestans and functional identification of transcription factor SpWRKY3.
Cui J; Xu P; Meng J; Li J; Jiang N; Luan Y
Theor Appl Genet; 2018 Apr; 131(4):787-800. PubMed ID: 29234827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metabolic Model of the
Rodenburg SYA; Seidl MF; Judelson HS; Vu AL; Govers F; de Ridder D
mBio; 2019 Jul; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 31289172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative transcriptome analysis of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in response to exogenous abscisic acid.
Wang Y; Tao X; Tang XM; Xiao L; Sun JL; Yan XF; Li D; Deng HY; Ma XR
BMC Genomics; 2013 Dec; 14(1):841. PubMed ID: 24289302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative transcriptome analysis between resistant and susceptible tomato allows the identification of lncRNA16397 conferring resistance to Phytophthora infestans by co-expressing glutaredoxin.
Cui J; Luan Y; Jiang N; Bao H; Meng J
Plant J; 2017 Feb; 89(3):577-589. PubMed ID: 27801966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative transcriptome analysis shows the defense response networks regulated by miR482b.
Jiang N; Cui J; Yang G; He X; Meng J; Luan Y
Plant Cell Rep; 2019 Jan; 38(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 30191311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative Proteomics Reveals the Dynamic Regulation of the Tomato Proteome in Response to
Fan KT; Hsu Y; Yeh CF; Chang CH; Chang WH; Chen YR
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33920680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Function identification of miR394 in tomato resistance to Phytophthora infestans.
Zhang YY; Hong YH; Liu YR; Cui J; Luan YS
Plant Cell Rep; 2021 Oct; 40(10):1831-1844. PubMed ID: 34230985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phytophthora capsici-tomato interaction features dramatic shifts in gene expression associated with a hemi-biotrophic lifestyle.
Jupe J; Stam R; Howden AJ; Morris JA; Zhang R; Hedley PE; Huitema E
Genome Biol; 2013 Jun; 14(6):R63. PubMed ID: 23799990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-throughput sequencing reveals differential expression of miRNAs in tomato inoculated with Phytophthora infestans.
Luan Y; Cui J; Zhai J; Li J; Han L; Meng J
Planta; 2015 Jun; 241(6):1405-16. PubMed ID: 25697288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathogen recognition in compatible plant-microbe interactions.
Rezzonico F; Rupp O; Fahrentrapp J
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6383. PubMed ID: 28743967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invertases in Phytophthora infestans Localize to Haustoria and Are Programmed for Infection-Specific Expression.
Kagda MS; Martínez-Soto D; Ah-Fong AMV; Judelson HS
mBio; 2020 Oct; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33051363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A secreted effector protein (SNE1) from Phytophthora infestans is a broadly acting suppressor of programmed cell death.
Kelley BS; Lee SJ; Damasceno CM; Chakravarthy S; Kim BD; Martin GB; Rose JK
Plant J; 2010 May; 62(3):357-66. PubMed ID: 20128886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interaction of roses with a biotrophic and a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen leads to differences in defense transcriptome activation.
Neu E; Domes HS; Menz I; Kaufmann H; Linde M; Debener T
Plant Mol Biol; 2019 Mar; 99(4-5):299-316. PubMed ID: 30706286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcriptional reprogramming of wheat and the hemibiotrophic pathogen Septoria tritici during two phases of the compatible interaction.
Yang F; Li W; Jørgensen HJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81606. PubMed ID: 24303057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gene Expression and Silencing Studies in Phytophthora infestans Reveal Infection-Specific Nutrient Transporters and a Role for the Nitrate Reductase Pathway in Plant Pathogenesis.
Abrahamian M; Ah-Fong AM; Davis C; Andreeva K; Judelson HS
PLoS Pathog; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1006097. PubMed ID: 27936244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MicroRNA396a-5p and -3p induce tomato disease susceptibility by suppressing target genes and upregulating salicylic acid.
Chen L; Meng J; Zhai J; Xu P; Luan Y
Plant Sci; 2017 Dec; 265():177-187. PubMed ID: 29223339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Tomato Nucleotide Binding Sites-Leucine-Rich Repeat Gene Is Positively Involved in Plant Resistance to Phytophthora infestans.
Jiang N; Cui J; Meng J; Luan Y
Phytopathology; 2018 Aug; 108(8):980-987. PubMed ID: 29595084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
