153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25808842)
1. Effect of dental cements on peri-implant microbial community: comparison of the microbial communities inhabiting the peri-implant tissue when using different luting cements.
Korsch M; Marten SM; Dötsch A; Jáuregui R; Pieper DH; Obst U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):e161-e166. PubMed ID: 25808842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of dental cement on the peri-implant biofilm-microbial comparison of two different cements in an in vivo observational study.
Korsch M; Marten SM; Walther W; Vital M; Pieper DH; Dötsch A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):806-813. PubMed ID: 30126038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peri-Implantitis Associated with Type of Cement: A Retrospective Analysis of Different Types of Cement and Their Clinical Correlation to the Peri-Implant Tissue.
Korsch M; Walther W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e434-43. PubMed ID: 25180598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cement-associated peri-implant mucositis. A 1-year follow-up after excess cement removal on the peri-implant tissue of dental implants.
Korsch M; Walther W; Bartols A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):523-529. PubMed ID: 28090743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement.
Korsch M; Obst U; Walther W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):797-802. PubMed ID: 23600620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Interaction of Implant Luting Cements and Oral Bacteria Linked to Peri-Implant Disease: An In Vitro Analysis of Planktonic and Biofilm Growth--A Preliminary Study.
Raval NC; Wadhwani CP; Jain S; Darveau RP
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1029-35. PubMed ID: 24909337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbial analysis of biofilms on cement surfaces: An investigation in cement-associated peri-implantitis.
Korsch M; Walther W; Marten SM; Obst U
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2014 Sep; 12(2):70-80. PubMed ID: 24980683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of Cement Particles Found in Peri-implantitis-Affected Human Biopsy Specimens.
Burbano M; Wilson TG; Valderrama P; Blansett J; Wadhwani CP; Choudhary PK; Rodriguez LC; Rodrigues DC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1168-73. PubMed ID: 26394356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of excess cement and tissue response to fixed implant-supported dentures after cementation.
Korsch M; Robra BP; Walther W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e45-53. PubMed ID: 23879821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does residual cement around implant-supported restorations cause peri-implant disease? A retrospective case analysis.
Linkevicius T; Puisys A; Vindasiute E; Linkeviciene L; Apse P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1179-84. PubMed ID: 22882700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimizing excess cement in implant-supported fixed restorations using an extraoral replica technique: a prospective 1-year study.
Frisch E; Ratka-Krüger P; Weigl P; Woelber J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1355-61. PubMed ID: 26574860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Factors Influencing Removal of the Cement Excess in Implant-Supported Restorations.
Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Maslova N; Linkeviciene L; Peciuliene V; Linkevicius T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 24224895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Luting Materials and Methods and the Restoration Surface on the Amount of Cement Remnants in Implant Restorations.
Lee JH; Yang SE; Lee J; Lee SY
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Aug; 45(4):301-307. PubMed ID: 31008680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study.
Wilson TG
J Periodontol; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1388-92. PubMed ID: 19722787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements.
Wadhwani C; Hess T; Faber T; Piñeyro A; Chen CS
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 20416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histologic findings within peri-implant soft tissue in failed implants secondary to excess cement: report of two cases and review of literature.
Ramer N; Wadhwani C; Kim A; Hershman D
N Y State Dent J; 2014 Mar; 80(2):43-6. PubMed ID: 24851393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
