169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25808887)
1. Predator experience overrides learned aversion to heterospecifics in stickleback species pairs.
Kozak GM; Boughman JW
Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Apr; 282(1805):. PubMed ID: 25808887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sequential mate choice and sexual isolation in threespine stickleback species.
Kozak GM; Head ML; Lackey AC; Boughman JW
J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 23194003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection?
Albert AY; Schluter D
Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15212390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.
Head ML; Kozak GM; Boughman JW
Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2183-96. PubMed ID: 23919161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential predation alters pigmentation in threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).
Gygax M; Rentsch AK; Rudman SM; Rennison DJ
J Evol Biol; 2018 Oct; 31(10):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 30055069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predator-induced maternal and paternal effects independently alter sexual selection.
Lehto WR; Tinghitella RM
Evolution; 2020 Feb; 74(2):404-418. PubMed ID: 31883271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predator-induced changes of female mating preferences: innate and experiential effects.
Bierbach D; Schulte M; Herrmann N; Tobler M; Stadler S; Jung CT; Kunkel B; Riesch R; Klaus S; Ziege M; Indy JR; Arias-Rodriguez L; Plath M
BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Jul; 11():190. PubMed ID: 21726456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Plastic responses to parents and predators lead to divergent shoaling behaviour in sticklebacks.
Kozak GM; Boughman JW
J Evol Biol; 2012 Apr; 25(4):759-69. PubMed ID: 22320242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shoal sex composition and predation risk influence sub-adult threespine stickleback shoaling decisions.
Rystrom TL; Clement VF; Rick IP; Bakker TCM; Mehlis M
Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():495-501. PubMed ID: 29933058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A female's past experience with predators affects male courtship and the care her offspring will receive from their father.
McGhee KE; Feng S; Leasure S; Bell AM
Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 282(1819):. PubMed ID: 26559956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conspicuous female ornamentation and tests of male mate preference in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).
Wright DS; Pierotti ME; Rundle HD; McKinnon JS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120723. PubMed ID: 25806520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mate choice, sexual imprinting, and speciation: a test of a one-allele isolating mechanism in sympatric sticklebacks.
Albert AY
Evolution; 2005 Apr; 59(4):927-31. PubMed ID: 15926703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exposure to predators does not lead to the evolution of larger brains in experimental populations of threespine stickleback.
Samuk K; Xue J; Rennision DJ
Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):916-929. PubMed ID: 29392719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Females sample more males at high nesting densities, but ultimately obtain less attractive mates.
Tinghitella RM; Stehle C; Boughman JW
BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 15():200. PubMed ID: 26385337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
Rundle HD; Schluter D
Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.
Tinghitella RM; Lackey ACR; Durso C; Koop JAH; Boughman JW
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Aug; 375(1806):20190546. PubMed ID: 32654644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impacts of trout predation on fitness of sympatric sticklebacks and their hybrids.
Vamosi SM; Schluter D
Proc Biol Sci; 2002 May; 269(1494):923-30. PubMed ID: 12028775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks?
Candolin U; Salesto T
Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 19117472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
