These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25808899)

  • 1. The causes of variation in the presence of genetic covariance between sexual traits and preferences.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 May; 91(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 25808899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
    Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insect mating signal and mate preference phenotypes covary among host plant genotypes.
    Rebar D; Rodríguez RL
    Evolution; 2015 Mar; 69(3):602-10. PubMed ID: 25611556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic coupling of signal and preference facilitates sexual isolation during rapid speciation.
    Xu M; Shaw KL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Oct; 286(1913):20191607. PubMed ID: 31640515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of sexual selection on trait divergence in a peripheral population with gene flow.
    Servedio MR; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2648-61. PubMed ID: 26332694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mate-sampling costs and sexy sons.
    Kokko H; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 25399634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quantitative genetics of sexually selected traits, preferred traits and preference: a review and analysis of the data.
    Prokuda AY; Roff DA
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2283-96. PubMed ID: 25263742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Condition-Dependent Mutual Mate Preference and Intersexual Genetic Correlations for Mating Activity.
    Han CS; Brooks RC; Dingemanse NJ
    Am Nat; 2020 Jun; 195(6):997-1008. PubMed ID: 32469657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phenotypic variation and covariation indicate high evolvability of acoustic communication in crickets.
    Blankers T; Lübke AK; Hennig RM
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 28(9):1656-69. PubMed ID: 26134540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of divergent female mating preference in response to experimental sexual selection.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2524-33. PubMed ID: 24931497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic variation in male attractiveness: It is time to see the forest for the trees.
    Prokop ZM; Drobniak SM
    Evolution; 2016 Apr; 70(4):913-21. PubMed ID: 26940698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of genetically linked female preference and male trait.
    McNiven VT; Moehring AJ
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2155-65. PubMed ID: 23888842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Describing mate preference functions and other function-valued traits.
    Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD; Gray DA; Höbel G; Rebar D; Reichert MS; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 28556474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of ecology in speciation by sexual selection: a systematic empirical review.
    Scordato ES; Symes LB; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():782-94. PubMed ID: 25149254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mate preference for a phenotypically plastic trait is learned, and may facilitate preference-phenotype matching.
    Westerman EL; Chirathivat N; Schyling E; Monteiro A
    Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1661-70. PubMed ID: 24528407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected.
    Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.