212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25809094)
1. A Novel Nonanchoring Technique for Implantation of Paddle Leads in the Cervical Spine Under Conscious Sedation.
Pahapill PA
Neuromodulation; 2015 Aug; 18(6):472-6; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 25809094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence of Revision Surgery in a Large Cohort of Patients With Thoracic Surgical Three-Column Paddle Leads: A Retrospective Case Review.
Pahapill PA
Neuromodulation; 2015 Jul; 18(5):367-75. PubMed ID: 25251044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical paddle-lead placement for screening trials of spinal cord stimulation.
Pahapill PA
Neuromodulation; 2014 Jun; 17(4):346-8; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 23815416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring for C1-2 spinal cord stimulation.
Muncie LM; Ellens NR; Tolod-Kemp E; Feler CA; Winestone JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 27689422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Localization of cervical and cervicomedullary stimulation leads for pain treatment using median nerve somatosensory evoked potential collision testing.
Balzer JR; Tomycz ND; Crammond DJ; Habeych M; Thirumala PD; Urgo L; Moossy JJ
J Neurosurg; 2011 Jan; 114(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 20509731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrograde thoracic spinal cord stimulation paddle placement for complex persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2.
de Monaco BA; Piedade GS; Doomi A; Jagid JR; Almeida T; Cordeiro JG
Pain Pract; 2024 Mar; 24(3):483-488. PubMed ID: 38041599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Lead Revision and Replacement for Misplaced or Displaced Electrodes.
Mong ER; Kethireddy S; Staudt MD
World Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; 186():e432-e439. PubMed ID: 38561030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate Abdominal Pain after Placement of Thoracic Paddle Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Case Series.
Lee JJ; Sadrameli SS; Desai VR; Austerman RJ; Leonard DM; Dalm BD
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2018; 96(6):400-405. PubMed ID: 30605913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of percutaneous and paddle lead implantation for spinal cord stimulation: a comparative analysis of complications, reoperation rates, and health-care costs.
Babu R; Hazzard MA; Huang KT; Ugiliweneza B; Patil CG; Boakye M; Lad SP
Neuromodulation; 2013; 16(5):418-26; discussion 426-7. PubMed ID: 23647789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical Paddle Electrode Implantation as a Rescue Therapy to Failed Percutaneous Leads in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients.
Witkam RL; Buijse ML; Arnts IJJ; Henssen DJHA; Vissers KCP; van Dongen R; Kurt E
Neuromodulation; 2022 Jul; 25(5):745-752. PubMed ID: 35227584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Placement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Electrodes Is Associated With Improved Perioperative and Long-Term Experience Among Neuropathic Pain Patients.
Shamji MF; Paul D; Mednikov A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Mar; 43(5):324-330. PubMed ID: 27997509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spinal Cord Stimulation Paddle-to-Percutaneous Revision: Case Series and Technical Description.
Staudt MD
World Neurosurg; 2024 Feb; 182():e891-e898. PubMed ID: 38128757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate of Complications Following Spinal Cord Stimulation Paddle Electrode Removal.
Maldonado-Naranjo AL; Frizon LA; Sabharwal NC; Xiao R; Hogue O; Lobel DA; Machado AG; Nagel SJ
Neuromodulation; 2018 Jul; 21(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 28833931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes of spinal cord stimulation with paddle leads in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome and failed back surgery syndrome.
Sears NC; Machado AG; Nagel SJ; Deogaonkar M; Stanton-Hicks M; Rezai AR; Henderson JM
Neuromodulation; 2011; 14(4):312-8; discussion 318. PubMed ID: 21992424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percutaneously Inserted Unilateral Lead Migration Salvaged with a Paddle Electrode.
Oh BH; Kim HT; Yim KH; Park YS
Pain Pract; 2020 Jun; 20(5):544-549. PubMed ID: 31925885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical spinal cord stimulation with 5-column paddle lead in Raynaud's disease.
Issa MA; Kim CH
Pain Physician; 2012; 15(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 22828684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anterograde revision of cervical spinal cord stimulator paddle electrode: a case report.
Penn DL; Zussman BM; Wu C; Sharan AD
Neuromodulation; 2012; 15(6):581-4; discussion 584-5. PubMed ID: 22494044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New technique for open placement of paddle-type spinal cord stimulator electrode in presence of epidural scar tissue.
Pabaney AH; Robin AM; Schwalb JM
Neuromodulation; 2014 Dec; 17(8):759-62; discussion 762. PubMed ID: 24725098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Computed Tomographic Analysis of Lead Position Between Three-Column and Five-Column Paddle Leads Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.
Choi JG; Ha SW; Son BC
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 97():292-303. PubMed ID: 27744081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision and Replacement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Leads.
Harland TA; Topp G; Shao K; Pilitsis JG
Neuromodulation; 2022 Jul; 25(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 35393239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]