These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25809114)
1. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review. Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review. Faggion CM; Huda F; Wasiak J J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 24666018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Risk of Bias on the Effect Size of Meta-Analytic Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. Faggion CM; Wu YC; Scheidgen M; Tu YK PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139030. PubMed ID: 26422698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM; Liu J; Huda F; Atieh M J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reporting of sources of funding in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM; Atieh M; Zanicotti DG Br Dent J; 2014 Feb; 216(3):109-12. PubMed ID: 24504292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis. Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of risk of bias assessments in a sample of intervention systematic reviews, Part II: focus on risk of bias tools reveals few meet current appraisal standards. Kolaski K; Clarke M; Logan LR J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Oct; 174():111460. PubMed ID: 39025376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study. Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in treating knee osteoarthritis: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews with ROBIS tool. Xing D; Wang B; Zhang W; Yang Z; Hou Y; Chen Y; Lin J Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 29044993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading journals of periodontology and implant dentistry: a survey. Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN J Periodontol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22220771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri-implant diseases with two methodological tools. Faggion CM; Monje A; Wasiak J J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Jun; 45(6):754-766. PubMed ID: 29575189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals. Liu Y; Yang S; Dai J; Xu Y; Zhang R; Jiang H; Yan X; Yang K PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28130. PubMed ID: 22174772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of risk of bias assessments in a sample of intervention systematic reviews, part I: many aspects of conduct and reporting need improvement. Kolaski K; Clarke M; Rathnayake D; Romeiser Logan L J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Oct; 174():111480. PubMed ID: 39047919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals. Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use and reporting of risk of bias tools in 825 systematic reviews of acupuncture: a cross-sectional study. Long Y; Wang X; Xiao W; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Huang J; Du L Acupunct Med; 2021 Aug; 39(4):318-326. PubMed ID: 32811166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Bilandzic A; Fitzpatrick T; Rosella L; Henry D PLoS Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1001987. PubMed ID: 27046153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS. Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of bias over time in updates of Cochrane oral health reviews. Faggion CM; Aranda L; Pandis N; Alarcón MA; Diaz KT J Dent; 2019 Jan; 80():63-68. PubMed ID: 30342067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The risk of bias of animal experiments in implant dentistry: a methodological study. Faggion CM; Diaz KT; Aranda L; Gabel F; Listl S; Alarcón MA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e39-e45. PubMed ID: 27083336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]