548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25809209)
1. Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012.
White A; Miller J; Royalty J; Ryerson AB; Benard V; Helsel W; Kammerer W
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 25809209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).
Eheman CR; Benard VB; Blackman D; Lawson HW; Anderson C; Helsel W; Lee NC
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Feb; 17(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16411050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of a Risk-Based Approach for Triaging Mammography Examinations During Periods of Reduced Capacity.
Miglioretti DL; Bissell MCS; Kerlikowske K; Buist DSM; Cummings SR; Henderson LM; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Rauscher GH; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Wernli KJ; Lee JM; Lee CI
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e211974. PubMed ID: 33764423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation for breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Allaire BT; Ekweme D; Hoerger TJ; DeGroff A; Rim SH; Subramanian S; Miller JW
Cancer Causes Control; 2019 Sep; 30(9):923-929. PubMed ID: 31297693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementing recommendations for the early detection of breast and cervical cancer among low-income women.
Lawson HW; Henson R; Bobo JK; Kaeser MK
MMWR Recomm Rep; 2000 Mar; 49(RR-2):37-55. PubMed ID: 15580731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.
Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors for breast cancer in women undergoing mammography.
Reuter KL; Baker SP; Krolikowski FJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 1729780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of a national program to provide free mammograms to low-income, uninsured women on breast cancer mortality rates.
Howard DH; Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Tangka FK; Li C; Miller JW
Cancer; 2010 Oct; 116(19):4456-62. PubMed ID: 20564744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the USA: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998-2012.
Howard DH; Tangka FK; Royalty J; Dalzell LP; Miller J; O'Hara B; Joseph K; Kenney K; Guy G; Hall IJ
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):657-68. PubMed ID: 25779379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
Yankaskas BC; Haneuse S; Kapp JM; Kerlikowske K; Geller B; Buist DS;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):692-701. PubMed ID: 20439838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimated effects of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on breast cancer mortality.
Hoerger TJ; Ekwueme DU; Miller JW; Uzunangelov V; Hall IJ; Segel J; Royalty J; Gardner JG; Smith JL; Li C
Am J Prev Med; 2011 Apr; 40(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 21406272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors associated with adequacy of diagnostic workup after abnormal breast cancer screening results.
Schootman M; Myers-Geadelmann J; Fuortes L
J Am Board Fam Pract; 2000; 13(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 10764189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meeting the cervical cancer screening needs of underserved women: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2004-2006.
Tangka FK; O'Hara B; Gardner JG; Turner J; Royalty J; Shaw K; Sabatino S; Hall IJ; Coates RJ
Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Jul; 21(7):1081-90. PubMed ID: 20361353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reported breast symptoms in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Ryerson AB; Miller J; Eheman CR
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):733-40. PubMed ID: 25754109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of the Gail model, body mass index and SNPs to predict breast cancer among women with abnormal (BI-RADS 4) mammograms.
McCarthy AM; Keller B; Kontos D; Boghossian L; McGuire E; Bristol M; Chen J; Domchek S; Armstrong K
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 25567532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases.
Seigneurin A; Exbrayat C; Labarère J; Delafosse P; Poncet F; Colonna M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 May; 127(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 20809364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
