These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25809397)
1. The effective differentiation of Salmonella isolates using four PCR-based typing methods. Hashemi A; Baghbani-Arani F J Appl Microbiol; 2015 Jun; 118(6):1530-40. PubMed ID: 25809397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular characterization of Salmonella isolates by REP-PCR and RAPD analysis. Albufera U; Bhugaloo-Vial P; Issack MI; Jaufeerally-Fakim Y Infect Genet Evol; 2009 May; 9(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 18243815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of four molecular typing methods for the differentiation of Salmonella spp. Lim H; Lee KH; Hong CH; Bahk GJ; Choi WS Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Dec; 105(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 16139380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Typing of clinical and environmental Aeromonas sp. strains by random amplified polymorphic DNA PCR, repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR, and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence PCR. Szczuka E; Kaznowski A J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Jan; 42(1):220-8. PubMed ID: 14715756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of different DNA-based fingerprinting methods for typing Photobacterium damselae ssp. piscicida. Mancuso M; Avendaño-Herrera R; Zaccone R; Toranzo AE; Magariños B Biol Res; 2007; 40(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17657358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-PCR for epidemiological studies of Salmonella. Millemann Y; Lesage-Descauses MC; Lafont JP; Chaslus-Dancla E FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 14(2-3):129-34. PubMed ID: 8809548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molecular typing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated from the Philippines by PCR-based methods. Maluping RP; Ravelo C; Lavilla-Pitogo CR; Krovacek K; Romalde JL J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 16033470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic fingerprinting of Bartonella species by repetitive element PCR for distinguishing species and isolates. Rodriguez-Barradas MC; Hamill RJ; Houston ED; Georghiou PR; Clarridge JE; Regnery RL; Koehler JE J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1089-93. PubMed ID: 7615711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Optimization and primary application of one molecular typing method of Salmonella, enterobacteia repetitive intergenic consensus sequences-based PCR in Salmonella]. Wang C; Liu H; Jiang X; Yu Q Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2008 Sep; 37(5):609-12. PubMed ID: 19069668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of ERIC PCR and AP PCR fingerprinting for discriminating Salmonella serotypes. Burr MD; Josephson KL; Pepper IL Lett Appl Microbiol; 1998 Jul; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 9722993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic fingerprinting of Bradyrhizobium japonicum isolates by RAPD and rep-PCR. Sikora S; Redzepović S; Bradić M Microbiol Res; 2002; 157(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 12398292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR and random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting for Helicobacter pylori strain differentiation. Finger SA; Velapatiño B; Kosek M; Santivañez L; Dailidiene D; Quino W; Balqui J; Herrera P; Berg DE; Gilman RH Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 72(7):4713-6. PubMed ID: 16820463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of five molecular subtyping methods for differentiation of Salmonella Kentucky isolates in Tunisia. Turki Y; Mehri I; Fhoula I; Hassen A; Ouzari H World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Jan; 30(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 23839713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of various molecular methods for rapid differentiation of intestinal bifidobacteria at the species, subspecies and strain level. Jarocki P; Podleśny M; Komoń-Janczara E; Kucharska J; Glibowska A; Targoński Z BMC Microbiol; 2016 Jul; 16(1):159. PubMed ID: 27449060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BOX-PCR is an adequate tool for typing Aeromonas spp. Tacão M; Alves A; Saavedra MJ; Correia A Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2005 Aug; 88(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 16096694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Typing of Listeria monocytogenes strains by repetitive element sequence-based PCR. Jersek B; Gilot P; Gubina M; Klun N; Mehle J; Tcherneva E; Rijpens N; Herman L J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 37(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 9854072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Serotyping & molecular characterization for study of genetic diversity among seafood associated nontyphoidal Salmonella serovars. Bhowmick PP; Srikumar S; Devegowda D; Shekar M; Darshanee Ruwandeepika HA; Karunasagar I Indian J Med Res; 2012 Mar; 135(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 22561625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different PCR approaches for typing of Francisella tularensis strains. de la Puente-Redondo VA; del Blanco NG; Gutiérrez-Martín CB; García-Peña FJ; Rodríguez Ferri EF J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Mar; 38(3):1016-22. PubMed ID: 10698989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of five repetitive-sequence-based PCR typing methods for molecular discrimination of Salmonella enterica isolates. Rasschaert G; Houf K; Imberechts H; Grijspeerdt K; De Zutter L; Heyndrickx M J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 43(8):3615-23. PubMed ID: 16081887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]