These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25809922)

  • 1. Relationship Between Speech Intelligibility and Speech Comprehension in Babble Noise.
    Fontan L; Tardieu J; Gaillard P; Woisard V; Ruiz R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):977-86. PubMed ID: 25809922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of listeners' working memory and noise on speech intelligibility in dysarthria.
    Lee Y; Sung JE; Sim H
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014 Oct; 28(10):785-95. PubMed ID: 24712561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of speech modification on non-native listeners for matrix-style sentences.
    Cooke M; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL151-7. PubMed ID: 25698043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability of Electrolaryngeal Speech Intelligibility in Multitalker Babble.
    Cox SR; McNicholl K; Shadle CH; Chen WR
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2020 Nov; 29(4):2012-2022. PubMed ID: 32870708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of speech understanding in various types of noise.
    Wong LL; Ng EH; Soli SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2642-51. PubMed ID: 23039457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The roles of fundamental frequency contours and sentence context in Mandarin Chinese speech intelligibility.
    Wang J; Shu H; Zhang L; Liu Z; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 23862913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: experts' opinions and naive normal-hearing listeners' performance.
    Hilkhuysen GL; Gaubitch N; Huckvale M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):404-15. PubMed ID: 23090965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Noise on Relationships Between Speech Intelligibility and Self-Reported Communication Measures in Tracheoesophageal Speakers.
    Eadie TL; Otero DS; Bolt S; Kapsner-Smith M; Sullivan JR
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Aug; 25(3):393-407. PubMed ID: 27379754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.