These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25810269)

  • 1. Estimating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using the Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Sample: A Fast, Nonparametric Regression-Based Method.
    Strong M; Oakley JE; Brennan A; Breeze P
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jul; 35(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 25810269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating multiparameter partial expected value of perfect information from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis sample: a nonparametric regression approach.
    Strong M; Oakley JE; Brennan A
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Apr; 34(3):311-26. PubMed ID: 24246566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Efficient Method for Computing Expected Value of Sample Information for Survival Data from an Ongoing Trial.
    Vervaart M; Strong M; Claxton KP; Welton NJ; Wisløff T; Aas E
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):612-625. PubMed ID: 34967237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient Value of Information Calculation Using a Nonparametric Regression Approach: An Applied Perspective.
    Tuffaha HW; Strong M; Gordon LG; Scuffham PA
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):505-9. PubMed ID: 27325343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. General-Purpose Methods for Simulating Survival Data for Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations.
    Vervaart M; Aas E; Claxton KP; Strong M; Welton NJ; Wisløff T; Heath A
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Jul; 43(5):595-609. PubMed ID: 36971425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient computation of partial expected value of sample information using Bayesian approximation.
    Brennan A; Kharroubi SA
    J Health Econ; 2007 Jan; 26(1):122-48. PubMed ID: 16945438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Efficient Estimator for the Expected Value of Sample Information.
    Menzies NA
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):308-20. PubMed ID: 25911600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient Monte Carlo Estimation of the Expected Value of Sample Information Using Moment Matching.
    Heath A; Manolopoulou I; Baio G
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 29126364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An efficient method for computing single-parameter partial expected value of perfect information.
    Strong M; Oakley JE
    Med Decis Making; 2013 Aug; 33(6):755-66. PubMed ID: 23275450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating expected value of sample information for incomplete data models using Bayesian approximation.
    Kharroubi SA; Brennan A; Strong M
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(6):839-52. PubMed ID: 21512189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accurate EVSI Estimation for Nonlinear Models Using the Gaussian Approximation Method.
    Li L; Jalal H; Heath A
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Jul; ():272989X241264287. PubMed ID: 39082512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the Expected Value of Sample Information across Different Sample Sizes Using Moment Matching and Nonlinear Regression.
    Heath A; Manolopoulou I; Baio G
    Med Decis Making; 2019 May; 39(4):346-358. PubMed ID: 31161867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Need for speed: an efficient algorithm for calculation of single-parameter expected value of partial perfect information.
    Sadatsafavi M; Bansback N; Zafari Z; Najafzadeh M; Marra C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):438-48. PubMed ID: 23538197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementing Generalized Additive Models to Estimate the Expected Value of Sample Information in a Microsimulation Model: Results of Three Case Studies.
    Rabideau DJ; Pei PP; Walensky RP; Zheng A; Parker RA
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):189-199. PubMed ID: 29117791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo Methods for the Calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.
    Fang W; Wang Z; Giles MB; Jackson CH; Welton NJ; Andrieu C; Thom H
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 34231446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expected value of sample information calculations in medical decision modeling.
    Ades AE; Lu G; Claxton K
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(2):207-27. PubMed ID: 15090106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculating Expected Value of Sample Information Adjusting for Imperfect Implementation.
    Heath A
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):626-636. PubMed ID: 35034542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using Efficient Nested Monte Carlo: A Tutorial.
    Heath A; Baio G
    Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1299-1304. PubMed ID: 30442277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk-based environmental remediation: Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis and the expected value of sample information.
    Dakins ME; Toll JE; Small MJ; Brand KP
    Risk Anal; 1996 Feb; 16(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 8868224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.