1175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25810432)
1. Integration of somatic mutation, expression and functional data reveals potential driver genes predictive of breast cancer survival.
Suo C; Hrydziuszko O; Lee D; Pramana S; Saputra D; Joshi H; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2607-13. PubMed ID: 25810432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-exome sequencing reveals recurrent somatic mutation networks in cancer.
Liu X; Wang J; Chen L
Cancer Lett; 2013 Nov; 340(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 23153794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of protein interactome networks prioritizes candidate genes with cancer signatures.
Li Y; Sahni N; Yi S
Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(48):78841-78849. PubMed ID: 27791983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical implications of genomic profiles in metastatic breast cancer with a focus on TP53 and PIK3CA, the most frequently mutated genes.
Kim JY; Lee E; Park K; Park WY; Jung HH; Ahn JS; Im YH; Park YH
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(17):27997-28007. PubMed ID: 28427202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Integrative Method Based on the Module-Network for Identifying Driver Genes in Cancer Subtypes.
Lu X; Li X; Liu P; Qian X; Miao Q; Peng S
Molecules; 2018 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 29364829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional modelling identifies novel genetic dependencies associated with breast cancer progression in the isogenic MCF10 model.
Maguire SL; Peck B; Wai PT; Campbell J; Barker H; Gulati A; Daley F; Vyse S; Huang P; Lord CJ; Farnie G; Brennan K; Natrajan R
J Pathol; 2016 Nov; 240(3):315-328. PubMed ID: 27512948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrative analysis of somatic mutations and transcriptomic data to functionally stratify breast cancer patients.
Zhang J; Abrams Z; Parvin JD; Huang K
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):513. PubMed ID: 27556157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonamplification ERBB2 genomic alterations in 5605 cases of recurrent and metastatic breast cancer: An emerging opportunity for anti-HER2 targeted therapies.
Ross JS; Gay LM; Wang K; Ali SM; Chumsri S; Elvin JA; Bose R; Vergilio JA; Suh J; Yelensky R; Lipson D; Chmielecki J; Waintraub S; Leyland-Jones B; Miller VA; Stephens PJ
Cancer; 2016 Sep; 122(17):2654-62. PubMed ID: 27284958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening of Prognostic Factors in Early-Onset Breast Cancer.
Yu Z; He Q; Xu G
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033819893670. PubMed ID: 32028860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased RNA Expression of von Willebrand Factor Gene Is Associated With Infiltrating Lobular Breast Cancer and Normal PAM50 Subtype.
Lehrer S; Green S; Dembitzer FR; Rheinstein PH; Rosenzweig KE
Cancer Genomics Proteomics; 2019; 16(3):147-153. PubMed ID: 31018945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uncovering the genomic heterogeneity of multifocal breast cancer.
Desmedt C; Fumagalli D; Pietri E; Zoppoli G; Brown D; Nik-Zainal S; Gundem G; Rothé F; Majjaj S; Garuti A; Carminati E; Loi S; Van Brussel T; Boeckx B; Maetens M; Mudie L; Vincent D; Kheddoumi N; Serra L; Massa I; Ballestrero A; Amadori D; Salgado R; de Wind A; Lambrechts D; Piccart M; Larsimont D; Campbell PJ; Sotiriou C
J Pathol; 2015 Aug; 236(4):457-66. PubMed ID: 25850943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transposon insertional mutagenesis in mice identifies human breast cancer susceptibility genes and signatures for stratification.
Chen L; Jenjaroenpun P; Pillai AM; Ivshina AV; Ow GS; Efthimios M; Zhiqun T; Tan TZ; Lee SC; Rogers K; Ward JM; Mori S; Adams DJ; Jenkins NA; Copeland NG; Ban KH; Kuznetsov VA; Thiery JP
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Mar; 114(11):E2215-E2224. PubMed ID: 28251929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stratification of Breast Cancer by Integrating Gene Expression Data and Clinical Variables.
He Z; Zhang J; Yuan X; Xi J; Liu Z; Zhang Y
Molecules; 2019 Feb; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 30754661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of candidate cancer drivers by integrative Epi-DNA and Gene Expression (iEDGE) data analysis.
Li A; Chapuy B; Varelas X; Sebastiani P; Monti S
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16904. PubMed ID: 31729402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome-wide screen identifies a novel prognostic signature for breast cancer survival.
Mao XY; Lee MJ; Zhu J; Zhu C; Law SM; Snijders AM
Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(8):14003-14016. PubMed ID: 28122328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of significantly mutated subnetworks in the breast cancer genome.
Ajwad R; Domaratzki M; Liu Q; Feizi N; Hu P
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):642. PubMed ID: 33436820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Novel Method for Identifying the Potential Cancer Driver Genes Based on Molecular Data Integration.
Zhang W; Wang SL
Biochem Genet; 2020 Feb; 58(1):16-39. PubMed ID: 31115714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A computational method for clinically relevant cancer stratification and driver mutation module discovery using personal genomics profiles.
Wang L; Li F; Sheng J; Wong ST
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S6. PubMed ID: 26099165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Integrative Approach for Identifying Network Biomarkers of Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Genomic, Interactomic, and Transcriptomic Data.
Firoozbakht F; Rezaeian I; D'agnillo M; Porter L; Rueda L; Ngom A
J Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):756-766. PubMed ID: 28650678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
