These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25810649)

  • 1. Reliability of Beta angle in assessing true anteroposterior apical base discrepancy in different growth patterns.
    Sundareswaran S; Kumar V
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2015; 6(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 25810649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study.
    Aparna P; Kumar DN; Prasad M; Shamnur N; G AK; K R S; B R GK; Gupta N
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Apr; 9(4):ZC38-41. PubMed ID: 26023641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tau Angle: A New Approach for Assessment of True Sagittal Maxillomandibular Relationship.
    Gupta P; Singh N; Tripathi T; Gopal R; Rai P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 33623336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three dimensional reliability analyses of currently used methods for assessment of sagittal jaw discrepancy.
    Almaqrami BS; Alhammadi MS; Cao B
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Apr; 10(4):e352-e360. PubMed ID: 29750096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of Beta Angle with Antero-Posterior Dysplasia Indicators and FMA: An Institution Based Cephalometric Study.
    Singh G; Verma S; Singh DP; Yadav SK; Yadav AB
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):ZC75-ZC78. PubMed ID: 28050509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishment of norms of the beta angle to assess the sagittal discrepancy for Nellore district population.
    Prasad M; Reddy KP; Talapaneni AK; Chaitanya N; Bhaskar Reddy MV; Patil R
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 4(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 24082742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
    Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.
    Plaza SP; Reimpell A; Silva J; Montoya D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 24(4):63-72. PubMed ID: 31508708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging-verified temporomandibular joint disk displacement in relation to sagittal and vertical jaw deformities.
    Jung WS; Kim H; Jeon DM; Mah SJ; Ahn SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1108-15. PubMed ID: 23618835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric Evaluation of Maxillary Incisors Inclination, Facial, and Growth Axes in Different Vertical and Sagittal Patterns: An Original Study.
    Bou Assi S; Macari A; Hanna A; Tarabay R; Salameh Z
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2020; 10(3):292-299. PubMed ID: 32802775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reliability evaluation for thirteen parameters describing anteroposterior apical base relationship in Angle Class II division 1 patients].
    Liu DX; Zhang L; Wang CL; Zhang XY; Guo J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 16999351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preliminary comparison of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in subjects with different sagittal and vertical patterns.
    Huang X; Hu X; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Gu Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):55. PubMed ID: 32066451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Study of anterior alveolar bone thickness in skeletal class III malocclusion patients with orthognathic surgery].
    Zhang J; Li XT
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 48(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 26885919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between Growth Patterns and Pharyngeal Widths in Different Skeletal Malocclusions in South Indian Population.
    Lakshmi KB; Yelchuru SH; Chandrika V; Lakshmikar OG; Sagar VL; Reddy GV
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2018; 8(3):224-228. PubMed ID: 29911059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
    Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gonial Angle by Lateral Cephalogram in Orthodontic Patients of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
    Bajracharya M; Rajbhandari A; Pradhan R; Manandhar P; Maharjan S; Pant BD
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2021 May; 59(237):482-485. PubMed ID: 34508422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.