186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25811499)
1. Predatory publishing is no joke.
Kennedy MS
Am J Nurs; 2015 Apr; 115(4):7. PubMed ID: 25811499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predatory publishing: Take care that you are not caught in the Open Access net.
Stone TE; Rossiter RC
Nurs Health Sci; 2015 Sep; 17(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 26224548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing.
Butler D
Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):433-5. PubMed ID: 23538810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "FakeBooks"--predatory journals: The dark side of publishing.
Natarajan S; Nair AG
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 64(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 27050342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ["Predatory publishers"].
Olsson H
Lakartidningen; 2012 Nov 21-27; 109(47):2136. PubMed ID: 23330475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
Beall J
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Authors beware! The rise of the predatory publisher.
Cartwright VA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 44(8):666-668. PubMed ID: 27870492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rise of the predators: Business is booming in the murky global market of suspect and sham publishers and journals.
Nelson B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Apr; 124(4):227-8. PubMed ID: 27078177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predatory journals: How to recognize and avoid the threat of involvement with these unethical "publishers".
Shahriari N; Grant-Kels JM; Payette MJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2016 Sep; 75(3):658-659. PubMed ID: 27543229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The nine flavours of open access scholarly publishing.
Willinsky J
J Postgrad Med; 2003; 49(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 14597793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The political dimension of open access: knowledge as a public good or as a commodity?].
Martinovich V
Salud Colect; 2015 Sep; 11(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 26418089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The downside of open-access publishing.
Haug C
N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(9):791-3. PubMed ID: 23445091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences.
Bowman JD
Am J Pharm Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(10):176. PubMed ID: 25657363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing.
Butler D
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):11. PubMed ID: 18596768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scholarly vanity press: why you should judge the book by its cover.
Norsted H
Acta Derm Venereol; 2015 Feb; 95(2):132. PubMed ID: 25741537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Open-access publishing can survive recession.
Aerts R
Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7241):967. PubMed ID: 19396122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific publishing. Money woes force some to change course.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5645):553. PubMed ID: 14576394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Open but not free--publishing in the 21st century.
Frank M
N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(9):787-9. PubMed ID: 23445089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Merchants of mayhem.
Nelson B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 27176736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
