BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25811932)

  • 1. Exploring the Effects of the Narrative Embodied in the Hearing Aid Fitting Process on Treatment Outcomes.
    Naylor G; Öberg M; Wänström G; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):517-26. PubMed ID: 25811932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).
    Brännström KJ; Wennerström I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):512-21. PubMed ID: 21034698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.
    Cox RM; Schwartz KS; Noe CM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 20890203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study of benefit and of acclimatization in recent users of hearing aids].
    Amorim RM; Almeida Kd
    Pro Fono; 2007; 19(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 17461346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting three-month and 12-month post-fitting real-world hearing-aid outcome using pre-fitting acceptable noise level (ANL).
    Wu YH; Ho HC; Hsiao SH; Brummet RB; Chipara O
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):285-94. PubMed ID: 26878163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-reported disability and handicap after hearing-aid fitting and benefit of hearing aids: comparison of fitting procedures, degree of hearing loss, experience with hearing aids and uni- and bilateral fittings.
    Metselaar M; Maat B; Krijnen P; Verschuure H; Dreschler WA; Feenstra L
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 266(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 19005632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome.
    Saunders GH; Lewis MS; Forsline A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 May; 20(5):320-34. PubMed ID: 19585963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing AIDS correctly?
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Am J Audiol; 2009 Jun; 18(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 19380509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users.
    Marriage J; Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Apr; 43(4):198-210. PubMed ID: 15250124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 9058034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.