These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25811932)

  • 21. Perceptual acclimatization post nonlinear frequency compression hearing aid fitting in older children.
    Glista D; Scollie S; Sulkers J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1765-87. PubMed ID: 22615475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Better together: reduced compliance after sequential versus simultaneous bilateral hearing aids fitting.
    Lavie L; Banai K; Attias J; Karni A
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 24096862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of self-report measures to examine changes in perception in response to fittings using different signal processing parameters.
    Anderson M; Rallapalli V; Schoof T; Souza P; Arehart K
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):809-815. PubMed ID: 30052097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of satisfaction measures of analog and digital hearing aid users.
    Magni C; Freiberger F; Tonn K
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2005; 71(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 16612528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Remote or in-clinic? The effect of service delivery mode on hearing aid output: study protocol for a double-blinded, randomised trial in adults with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lett C; Welch D; Dobson R
    Trials; 2024 Apr; 25(1):256. PubMed ID: 38610038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prediction of IOI-HA scores using speech reception thresholds and speech discrimination scores in quiet.
    Brännström KJ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Olsen SØ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 24828216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings--1. Patterns of benefit.
    Gatehouse S; Naylor G; Elberling C
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Mar; 45(3):130-52. PubMed ID: 16579490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: comparison between young and old elderly.
    Chang WH; Tseng HC; Chao TK; Hsu CJ; Liu TC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 138(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 18503844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effectiveness of a teleaudiology approach to hearing aid fitting.
    Blamey PJ; Blamey JK; Saunders E
    J Telemed Telecare; 2015 Dec; 21(8):474-8. PubMed ID: 26556060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services.
    Gatehouse S
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1999 Nov; 57(6):424-36. PubMed ID: 12811876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors Associated With Successful Setup of a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid and the Need for Personalized Support.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Hickson L; Meyer C
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):794-804. PubMed ID: 30285978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
    Dawes P; Hopkins R; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the Self-Fitting Process with a Commercially Available Hearing Aid.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; McLelland M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):109-118. PubMed ID: 28240978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of online rehabilitative intervention for adult hearing-aid users.
    Thorén ES; Oberg M; Wänström G; Andersson G; Lunner T
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jul; 53(7):452-61. PubMed ID: 24749664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.
    Mackersie C; Boothroyd A; Lithgow A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 29894379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
    Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].
    de Almeida K; Taguchi CK
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fitting hearing aids to first-time users.
    Arlinger S; Lyregaard PE; Billermark E; Oberg M
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(3):150-8. PubMed ID: 10990013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.