250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25812042)
1. Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
Carere DA; Kraft P; Kaphingst KA; Roberts JS; Green RC
Genet Med; 2016 Jan; 18(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25812042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.
Carere DA; VanderWeele TJ; Vassy JL; van der Wouden CH; Roberts JS; Kraft P; Green RC
Genet Med; 2017 May; 19(5):537-545. PubMed ID: 27657683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Personal Genomic Testing for Cancer Risk: Results From the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.
Gray SW; Gollust SE; Carere DA; Chen CA; Cronin A; Kalia SS; Rana HQ; Ruffin MT; Wang C; Roberts JS; Green RC
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Feb; 35(6):636-644. PubMed ID: 27937091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diet and exercise changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
Nielsen DE; Carere DA; Wang C; Roberts JS; Green RC;
BMC Med Genomics; 2017 May; 10(1):24. PubMed ID: 28464943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing on perceived risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer: findings from the PGen study.
Carere DA; VanderWeele T; Moreno TA; Mountain JL; Roberts JS; Kraft P; Green RC;
BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Oct; 8():63. PubMed ID: 26468061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
Roberts JS; Gornick MC; Carere DA; Uhlmann WR; Ruffin MT; Green RC
Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 28068660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.
Savard J; Hickerton C; Metcalfe SA; Gaff C; Middleton A; Newson AJ
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 31885332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.
Koeller DR; Uhlmann WR; Carere DA; Green RC; Roberts JS;
J Genet Couns; 2017 Dec; 26(6):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 28512697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
van der Wouden CH; Carere DA; Maitland-van der Zee AH; Ruffin MT; Roberts JS; Green RC;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Apr; 164(8):513-22. PubMed ID: 26928821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.
Metcalfe SA; Hickerton C; Savard J; Stackpoole E; Tytherleigh R; Tutty E; Terrill B; Turbitt E; Gray K; Middleton A; Wilson B; Newson AJ; Gaff C
Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):290-299. PubMed ID: 30439534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adopting genetics: motivations and outcomes of personal genomic testing in adult adoptees.
Baptista NM; Christensen KD; Carere DA; Broadley SA; Roberts JS; Green RC
Genet Med; 2016 Sep; 18(9):924-32. PubMed ID: 26820063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Savard J; Mooney-Somers J; Newson AJ; Kerridge I
Intern Med J; 2014 Jan; 44(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24450520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptions, motivations and decision regret surrounding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
Kaing A; Rosen MP; Quinn MM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2047-2057. PubMed ID: 32756971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How Well Do Customers of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing Services Comprehend Genetic Test Results? Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.
Ostergren JE; Gornick MC; Carere DA; Kalia SS; Uhlmann WR; Ruffin MT; Mountain JL; Green RC; Roberts JS;
Public Health Genomics; 2015; 18(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 26087778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing patients' decision-making about preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.
Cheng L; Meiser B; Kirk E; Kennedy D; Barlow-Stewart K; Kaur R
Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 37(11):2599-2610. PubMed ID: 36006036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond the biopsy: predictors of decision regret and anxiety following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
Goldman KN; Blakemore J; Kramer Y; McCulloh DH; Lawson A; Grifo JA
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1260-1269. PubMed ID: 31220868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of personal genomic testing for disease-prevention behavior when combined with careful consultation with a physician: a preliminary study.
Hayashi M; Watanabe A; Muramatsu M; Yamashita N
BMC Res Notes; 2018 Apr; 11(1):223. PubMed ID: 29615115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.
Stewart KFJ; Kokole D; Wesselius A; Schols AMWJ; Zeegers MP; de Vries H; van Osch LADM
Public Health Genomics; 2018; 21(1-2):45-52. PubMed ID: 30359983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G>A: the consumer experience.
Elson SL; Furlotte NA; Hromatka BS; Wilson CH; Mountain JL; Rowbotham HM; Varga EA; Francke U
Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2020 Nov; 8(11):e1468. PubMed ID: 32940023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Personal genomic screening: How best to facilitate preparedness of future clients.
Fleming J; Terrill B; Dziadek M; Kirk EP; Roscioli T; Barlow-Stewart K
Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 31085343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
