250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25812042)
21. Metastatic breast cancer patient perceptions of somatic tumor genomic testing.
Adams EJ; Asad S; Reinbolt R; Collier KA; Abdel-Rasoul M; Gillespie S; Chen JL; Cherian MA; Noonan AM; Sardesai S; VanDeusen J; Wesolowski R; Williams N; Shapiro CL; Macrae ER; Pilarski R; Toland AE; Senter L; Ramaswamy B; Lee CN; Lustberg MB; Stover DG
BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):389. PubMed ID: 32375690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals.
McGrath SP; Walton N; Williams MS; Kim KK; Bastola K
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Nov; 19(1):844. PubMed ID: 31760949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Living at Risk: Factors That Affect the Experience of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.
Oliveri S; Renzi C; Masiero M; Pravettoni G
Mayo Clin Proc; 2015 Oct; 90(10):1323-6. PubMed ID: 26434959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports.
Shaer O; Nov O; Okerlund J; Balestra M; Stowell E; Ascher L; Bi J; Schlenker C; Ball M
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e146. PubMed ID: 26070951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perceptions of genetic counseling services in direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
Darst BF; Madlensky L; Schork NJ; Topol EJ; Bloss CS
Clin Genet; 2013 Oct; 84(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 23590221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Covolo L; Rubinelli S; Ceretti E; Gelatti U
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e279. PubMed ID: 26677835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Implicit bias in diagnosing mosaicism amongst preimplantation genetic testing providers: results from a multicenter study of 36 395 blastocysts.
Popovic M; Borot L; Lorenzon AR; Lopes ALRC; Sakkas D; Lledó B; Morales R; Ortiz JA; Polyzos NP; Parriego M; Azpiroz F; Galain M; Pujol A; Menten B; Dhaenens L; Vanden Meerschaut F; Stoop D; Rodriguez M; de la Blanca EP; Rodríguez A; Vassena R
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):258-274. PubMed ID: 37873575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Consumer Motivation and Behavior.
Nelson SC; Bowen DJ; Fullerton SM
Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Jul; 105(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 31204012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
McGuire AL; Diaz CM; Wang T; Hilsenbeck SG
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):3-10. PubMed ID: 19998099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers.
Mavroidopoulou V; Xera E; Mollaki V
J Hum Genet; 2015 Sep; 60(9):515-23. PubMed ID: 26040209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies tell their customers to 'see a genetic counselor'. How do genetic counselors feel about direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
Hsieh V; Braid T; Gordon E; Hercher L
J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):191-197. PubMed ID: 32706156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Anxiety delivered direct-to-consumer: are we asking the right questions about the impacts of DTC genetic testing?
Oliveri S; Howard HC; Renzi C; Hansson MG; Pravettoni G
J Med Genet; 2016 Dec; 53(12):798-799. PubMed ID: 27647845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Design, methods, and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing customers.
Carere DA; Couper MP; Crawford SD; Kalia SS; Duggan JR; Moreno TA; Mountain JL; Roberts JS; Green RC;
Genome Med; 2014; 6(12):96. PubMed ID: 25484922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 23andMe markets carrier screening service directly to consumers: Service offers results on carrier status, raises concerns among geneticists.
Levenson D
Am J Med Genet A; 2016 Feb; 170A(2):293-294. PubMed ID: 26804052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Implications of Personal Genomic Testing for Health Behaviors: The Case of Smoking.
Olfson E; Hartz S; Carere DA; Green RC; Roberts JS; Bierut LJ;
Nicotine Tob Res; 2016 Dec; 18(12):2273-2277. PubMed ID: 27613923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Genetic counseling following direct-to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives.
Marzulla T; Roberts JS; DeVries R; Koeller DR; Green RC; Uhlmann WR
J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):329-334. PubMed ID: 32648332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Australians' views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz study.
Savard J; Hickerton C; Tytherleigh R; Terrill B; Turbitt E; Newson AJ; Wilson B; Gray K; Gaff C; Middleton A; Stackpoole E; Metcalfe SA
Eur J Hum Genet; 2019 May; 27(5):711-720. PubMed ID: 30666046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experience with Personal Genetic Testing.
Haga SB; Kim E; Myers RA; Ginsburg GS
J Pers Med; 2019 May; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 31137623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genetics educational needs in China: physicians' experience and knowledge of genetic testing.
Li J; Xu T; Yashar BM
Genet Med; 2015 Sep; 17(9):757-60. PubMed ID: 25503494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of nutrition-focused mobile apps' influence on consumers' healthy food behaviour and nutrition knowledge.
Samoggia A; Riedel B
Food Res Int; 2020 Feb; 128():108766. PubMed ID: 31955740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
