These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25813370)

  • 1. Experimental validation of beam quality correction factors for proton beams.
    Gomà C; Hofstetter-Boillat B; Safai S; Vörös S
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3207-16. PubMed ID: 25813370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proton beam monitor chamber calibration.
    Gomà C; Lorentini S; Meer D; Safai S
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(17):4961-71. PubMed ID: 25109620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams.
    Vilches-Freixas G; Bosmans G; Douralis A; Martens J; Meijers A; Rinaldi I; Salvo K; Thomas R; Palmans H; Lourenço A
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(10):. PubMed ID: 38640918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy.
    Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when (60)Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams.
    Andreo P; Wulff J; Burns DT; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6593-621. PubMed ID: 24018471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
    Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Lourenço A; Medin J; Vatnitsky S; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(19):. PubMed ID: 36096096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical Note: Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement of two cylindrical ionization chambers in a clinical proton beam.
    Sugama Y; Nishio T; Onishi H
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3892-5. PubMed ID: 26133590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams.
    Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT4.
    Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):055015. PubMed ID: 31962306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of PTW-31015 PinPoint ionization chambers in photon and proton beams.
    Carlino A; Stock M; Zagler N; Marrale M; Osorio J; Vatnitsky S; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185020. PubMed ID: 30152791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo calculated ionization chamber correction factors in clinical proton beams - deriving uncertainties from published data.
    Baumann KS; Gomà C; Wulff J; Kretschmer J; Zink K
    Phys Med; 2023 Sep; 113():102655. PubMed ID: 37603909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
    Swanpalmer J
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
    Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ion recombination correction in the Clatterbridge Centre of Oncology clinical proton beam.
    Palmans H; Thomas R; Kacperek A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):903-17. PubMed ID: 16467586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dosimetry recommendations for clinical proton beams.
    Medin J; Andreo P; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3195-211. PubMed ID: 11098898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental determination of
    Medin J; Andreo P; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35081517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.