197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25813430)
1. Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.
Charaziak KK; Siegel JH
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Jun; 16(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 25813430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.
Charaziak KK; Siegel JH
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):883-96. PubMed ID: 25230801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.
Charaziak KK; Souza P; Siegel JH
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 14(6):843-62. PubMed ID: 24013802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.
Charaziak KK; Souza PE; Siegel JH
Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 25290042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The shape of 2f1-f2 suppression tuning curves reflects basilar membrane specializations in the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii.
Frank G; Kössl M
Hear Res; 1995 Mar; 83(1-2):151-60. PubMed ID: 7607981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human.
Wang Y; Gong Q; Zhang T
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 May; 15(1):51. PubMed ID: 27160830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Spatial Origins of Cochlear Amplification Assessed by Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.
Goodman SS; Lee C; Guinan JJ; Lichtenhan JT
Biophys J; 2020 Mar; 118(5):1183-1195. PubMed ID: 31968228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Howard MA; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):285-96. PubMed ID: 11831802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.
Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):972-83. PubMed ID: 9714917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.
Kössl M
Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 8150746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An objective assessment method for frequency selectivity of the human auditory system.
Gong Q; Wang Y; Xian M
Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Dec; 13():171. PubMed ID: 25522838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering.
Siegel JH; Cerka AJ; Recio-Spinoso A; Temchin AN; van Dijk P; Ruggero MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2434-43. PubMed ID: 16266165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Delays and Generating Mechanisms in Guinea Pigs, Chinchillas, and Simulations.
Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 16(6):679-94. PubMed ID: 26373935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.
Dewey JB; Dhar S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 27681700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in chickens.
Sun W; Chen L; Salvi RJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(4):206-13. PubMed ID: 12097720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.
Brass D; Kemp DT
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):920-39. PubMed ID: 8445127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
Manley GA; van Dijk P
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():53-62. PubMed ID: 27139323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates.
Abdala C; Sininger YS; Ekelid M; Zeng FG
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 8880180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary tone levels.
Abdala C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1465-76. PubMed ID: 11572357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
