These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25813433)
21. Robotic right hemicolectomy: Analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Parisi A; Scrucca L; Desiderio J; Gemini A; Guarino S; Ricci F; Cirocchi R; Palazzini G; D'Andrea V; Minelli L; Trastulli S Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28317582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterizing the learning curve for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: buddy operating as a technique for accelerating skill acquisition. Reade C; Hauspy J; Schmuck ML; Moens F Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jul; 21(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 21412161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the learning curve of robot Xie J; Lei Y; Zhang H; Liu Y; Yi B Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 May; 48(5):716-724. PubMed ID: 37539574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter than laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?: a comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. Park EJ; Kim CW; Cho MS; Kim DW; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK Medicine (Baltimore); 2014 Nov; 93(25):e109. PubMed ID: 25437022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robot-assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Cancers. Zanagnolo V; Garbi A; Achilarre MT; Minig L J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):379-396. PubMed ID: 28104497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery using the cumulative sum method. Sugishita T; Tsukamoto S; Imaizumi J; Takamizawa Y; Inoue M; Moritani K; Kinugasa Y; Kanemitsu Y Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5947-5955. PubMed ID: 34981227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fellowship learning curve associated with completing a robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Sandadi S; Gadzinski JA; Lee S; Chi DS; Sonoda Y; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Gardner GJ; Barakat RR; Leitao MM Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 24262878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the learning curve of total robotic hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy for a gynecologic oncology service. Rocconi RP; Meredith C; Finan MA J Robot Surg; 2011 Sep; 5(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 27637706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Learning curve analysis of multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy. Lee YJ; Lee DE; Oh HR; Ha HI; Lim MC Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 306(5):1555-1561. PubMed ID: 35767099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Learning Curve Analysis of Different Stages of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Tang FH; Tsai EM Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():1827913. PubMed ID: 28373977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program. Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study. Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies. Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcome of robot-assisted surgery for stage IA endometrial cancer compared to open and laparoscopic surgeries: a retrospective study at a single institution. Ikebuchi A; Komatsu H; Yamamoto K; Okawa M; Hikino K; Iida Y; Hosokawa M; Sawada M; Kudoh A; Sato S; Harada T; Taniguchi F J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):133. PubMed ID: 38520654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Da vinci robotic surgery in gynaecological oncology: a critical interim appraisal]. Bartos P; Struppl D; Trhlík M; Czudek S; Skrovina M; Adamcík L; Soumarová R Ceska Gynekol; 2007 Oct; 72(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 18175521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robotic radical hysterectomy in the management of gynecologic malignancies. Pareja R; Ramirez PT J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):673-6. PubMed ID: 18774759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology. El Hachem L; Momeni M; Friedman K; Moshier EL; Chuang LT; Gretz HF Int J Med Robot; 2016 Sep; 12(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 26096813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]