These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25813489)

  • 1. Predictive statistical models linking antecedent meteorological conditions and waterway bacterial contamination in urban waterways.
    Farnham DJ; Lall U
    Water Res; 2015 Jun; 76():143-59. PubMed ID: 25813489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian model for flow-class dependent distributions of fecal-indicator bacterial concentration in surface waters.
    Schoen ME; Small MJ; Vanbriesen JM
    Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):1006-16. PubMed ID: 19931885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meteorological effects on the levels of fecal indicator bacteria in an urban stream: a modeling approach.
    Cho KH; Cha SM; Kang JH; Lee SW; Park Y; Kim JW; Kim JH
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2189-202. PubMed ID: 20138642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressing uncertainty in fecal indicator bacteria dark inactivation rates.
    Gronewold AD; Myers L; Swall JL; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):652-64. PubMed ID: 20843534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial and temporal variability of fecal indicator bacteria in an urban stream under different meteorological regimes.
    Cha SM; Lee SW; Park YE; Cho KH; Lee S; Kim JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(12):3102-8. PubMed ID: 20555206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
    Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loading of fecal indicator bacteria in North Carolina tidal creek headwaters: hydrographic patterns and terrestrial runoff relationships.
    Stumpf CH; Piehler MF; Thompson S; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4704-15. PubMed ID: 20673947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enterococci vs coliforms as a possible fecal contamination indicator: baseline data for Karachi.
    Hussain M; Rasool SA; Khan MT; Wajid A
    Pak J Pharm Sci; 2007 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17416563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): sources, fate and modelling.
    Servais P; Garcia-Armisen T; George I; Billen G
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 375(1-3):152-67. PubMed ID: 17239424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling spatiotemporal bacterial variability with meteorological and watershed land-use characteristics.
    Cha Y; Park MH; Lee SH; Kim JH; Cho KH
    Water Res; 2016 Sep; 100():306-315. PubMed ID: 27208919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of empirical predictive modeling using conventional and alternative fecal indicator bacteria in eastern North Carolina waters.
    Gonzalez RA; Conn KE; Crosswell JR; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2012 Nov; 46(18):5871-82. PubMed ID: 22981488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of microbiological water quality in the Pettaquamscutt River (Rhode Island, USA) using chemical, molecular and culture-dependent methods.
    Atoyan JA; Herron EM; Amador JA
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 Jul; 62(7):1577-83. PubMed ID: 21570698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of multiple linear regression models as predictive tools for fecal indicator concentrations in a stretch of the lower Lahn River, Germany.
    Herrig IM; Böer SI; Brennholt N; Manz W
    Water Res; 2015 Nov; 85():148-57. PubMed ID: 26318647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term characterization of residential runoff and assessing potential surrogates of fecal indicator organisms.
    Reano DC; Haver DL; Oki LR; Yates MV
    Water Res; 2015 May; 74():67-76. PubMed ID: 25710901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of statistical models to predict fecal indicator bacteria concentrations enumerated by qPCR- and culture-based methods.
    Gonzalez RA; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():296-305. PubMed ID: 24139103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacterial indicator response for ocean recreational water quality testing.
    Noble RT; Moore DF; Leecaster MK; McGee CD; Weisberg SB
    Water Res; 2003 Apr; 37(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 12600392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impacts of rainfall on the water quality of the Newport River Estuary (Eastern North Carolina, USA).
    Coulliette AD; Noble RT
    J Water Health; 2008 Dec; 6(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 18401112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beach boundary layer: a framework for addressing recreational water quality impairment at enclosed beaches.
    Grant SB; Sanders BF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(23):8804-13. PubMed ID: 20949912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Campylobacter spp. and Escherichia coli data and Bayesian microbial risk assessment to examine public health risks in agricultural watersheds under tile drainage management.
    Schmidt PJ; Pintar KD; Fazil AM; Flemming CA; Lanthier M; Laprade N; Sunohara MD; Simhon A; Thomas JL; Topp E; Wilkes G; Lapen DR
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3255-72. PubMed ID: 23623467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors controlling variability in nearshore fecal pollution: the effects of mortality.
    Rippy MA; Franks PJ; Feddersen F; Guza RT; Moore DF
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Jan; 66(1-2):191-8. PubMed ID: 23177240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.